COALESCE Lab
@coalescelab.bsky.social
Laboratory for the Computational Analysis of Egonetworks, Social Cohesion, and Exclusion at UAB Barcelona. We conduct mixed-methods research on personal networks, migration, cohesion, exclusion, and polarization: http://coalesce-lab.com/en.
Reposted by COALESCE Lab
I gave a webinar from this work with the International Social Capital Association, available here - www.intsocialcapital.org/event/toward...
Toward a Unified Conceptualization of Social Capital - International Social Capital Association (ISCA)
Social capital is among the most broadly used concepts in social science. Despite its shared understanding as beneficial resources available from the connections between people, authors vary widely in...
www.intsocialcapital.org
November 12, 2025 at 6:00 AM
I gave a webinar from this work with the International Social Capital Association, available here - www.intsocialcapital.org/event/toward...
Want to read more about this? Check the original post here: inclusivitynorms.com/inclusive-di.... Find versions in Spanish (coalesce-lab.com/en/news/32/e...) and Catalan (coalesce-lab.com/en/news/33/e...) in our website too.
Funding from a @volkswagenstiftung.de grant.
Funding from a @volkswagenstiftung.de grant.
Inclusive dialogue? “Yes, but…” - INCLUSIVITY - Inclusivity Norms to Counter Polarization in European Societies
Exceptions to the principle of inclusive dialogue Authors: Noé Gras-Aura, Marc Alcalà-i-Rams, Alejandro Ciordia & Miranda J. Lubbers As part of the INCLUSIVITY research project, we interviewed 76 citi...
inclusivitynorms.com
April 24, 2025 at 6:41 AM
Want to read more about this? Check the original post here: inclusivitynorms.com/inclusive-di.... Find versions in Spanish (coalesce-lab.com/en/news/32/e...) and Catalan (coalesce-lab.com/en/news/33/e...) in our website too.
Funding from a @volkswagenstiftung.de grant.
Funding from a @volkswagenstiftung.de grant.
(3) Yes, but not with you: justification for avoiding dialogue with social contacts who differ in political views (for example, independentists and Spanish nationalists with each other), or with any intolerant (mainly in political terms), uneducated or disrespectful individual.
April 24, 2025 at 6:41 AM
(3) Yes, but not with you: justification for avoiding dialogue with social contacts who differ in political views (for example, independentists and Spanish nationalists with each other), or with any intolerant (mainly in political terms), uneducated or disrespectful individual.
(2) Yes, but not about this: feeling it is impossible to talk about certain sensitive topics such as the debate over Catalan independence or something against the law; but also avoiding diverse forms of hate speech and tricky issues that should be avoided to prevent discomfort.
April 24, 2025 at 6:41 AM
(2) Yes, but not about this: feeling it is impossible to talk about certain sensitive topics such as the debate over Catalan independence or something against the law; but also avoiding diverse forms of hate speech and tricky issues that should be avoided to prevent discomfort.
(1) Yes, but not like this: situations where participants believed that the conditions for genuine political dialogue were lacking; lack of a possible agreement or shared outcome for those expecting something out of such dialogue, or the impossibility of changing someone’s mind.
April 24, 2025 at 6:41 AM
(1) Yes, but not like this: situations where participants believed that the conditions for genuine political dialogue were lacking; lack of a possible agreement or shared outcome for those expecting something out of such dialogue, or the impossibility of changing someone’s mind.
As part of the INCLUSIVITY research project, we asked 76 citizens of Catalonia (between 2022 and 2023) their views on a general and abstract principle of inclusive dialogue. Most agreed, but then revealed how their actions contradicted their opinions. This is what we found:
April 24, 2025 at 6:41 AM
As part of the INCLUSIVITY research project, we asked 76 citizens of Catalonia (between 2022 and 2023) their views on a general and abstract principle of inclusive dialogue. Most agreed, but then revealed how their actions contradicted their opinions. This is what we found: