Clutter Wizard
clutterwizard.bsky.social
Clutter Wizard
@clutterwizard.bsky.social
Ah yes. We all know that "your money or your life" is the epitome of consent.
January 5, 2026 at 7:43 PM
They didn't imply the video blamed the patriarchy. How is this so confusing to you? The chapter titles alone blame women.
January 5, 2026 at 7:18 PM
The absolute is not usually implied in broad statements. "Cats do this, they don't do that."

It only implies that the behavior or quality is common enough to be noteworthy or significant.

Of course, context is everything, and if an absolute all statement had been made earlier, rest probably do too
January 5, 2026 at 7:16 PM
That's not what they said. You can't read.
January 5, 2026 at 5:38 PM
Trump was gifted the ability to talk forever, but you can see that he is no longer aware of what he's saying and that it manifests in seconds. The fact that he has no filter and turns to insults and the fact that he will tell you he won't speak on a topic and then immediately speak if you ask again.
December 11, 2025 at 5:00 AM
That would be because I know how stutters manifest and how much effort it takes to hide it. Biden getting older and slower obviously means he can no longer mask and we keep seeing him try and fail to mask. Meaning he loses words but can't find a suitible replacement and finds wrong one in a panic.
December 11, 2025 at 4:57 AM
That's literally a stutter. The method most people who suffer from it learn to cope is to swap words when they're locked out. If you think even the majority of stutterers just porky pig their way through speech, then you're just completely out of touch and need to stop pretending you have a clue.
December 10, 2025 at 3:13 PM
What evidence do you have for any of this? Why do you just say things?
December 10, 2025 at 3:10 PM
As you should. It's hard to tell what rage bait material is even genuine on x. Can't prove those people are vegans. And even if they are vegans, they might just be being aggressive and starting fights to farm engagement.

Bots do that all the time just to manipulate the algorithm. Every topic.
November 4, 2025 at 7:12 PM
Yes. You lack credibility. If you say something happened, I need proof. You don't have proof. You just have an oversized ego that said you can't ever be questioned and you completely lose it if you get called out.
November 4, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Yes. Do you spend all your time getting worked up about bad things you ASSUME are happening?

How do you live?
November 4, 2025 at 3:14 PM
Nobody did that here. You're losing your mind.

Is this your first time on the internet? There's just people out there looking to be aggrieved for any little thing. You're one of them. You're identical to these supposed vegans.
November 4, 2025 at 2:58 PM
Literally nobody thinks that. You have never met a vegan or anybody else that said anything close to that.

Every vegan I've ever known has ethical problems with the kind of life an animal lived under factory farming. Like chickens never seeing the sun.

Not that they'd live forever. That's nuts.
November 4, 2025 at 1:50 PM
We're you just into freedom of speech as a goof? You having a laugh at the American public? The year isn't even over and you're already throwing this award in the trash.
November 4, 2025 at 12:48 AM
How is Trump's tweet part of democrat projection?
October 27, 2025 at 12:11 PM
Am I reading that right? Santos has a regular column?
October 18, 2025 at 4:26 PM
That doesn't explain anything. It literally only communicates that you believe something they said was ignorant, but you didn't clarify, and therefore you feel confident in assuming everything they might say about a subject as broad as labor is also ignorant.

Your communication skills are missing.
October 10, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Or you could just say in plain English how thinking one-time checks fails to solve the larger problem means you are also against a general strike.
October 10, 2025 at 5:20 PM
You've failed to show that in any capacity. The slight position in this case is not being satisfied with a single $2000 check.
October 7, 2025 at 10:13 PM
That's an extreme position you used in your example, though. Thinking one-time checks fail to fix the problem is hardly extreme.
October 7, 2025 at 6:14 PM
I don't think any labor history lesson would justify deciding that anybody who disagrees with you on one thing must disagree with you on everything.
October 7, 2025 at 2:48 AM
You don't know that. How about you get mad at something they actually said instead of something you imagine they'd say?
October 7, 2025 at 12:27 AM
Your response is to say that defying orders is a bad idea?

Fine, dude. Keep following the mad king's orders to pick up trash and bully brown people, I guess.

Turns out your legacy of service isn't as important as I thought it was.
October 2, 2025 at 3:47 PM
With the world being as crazy as it is, it's asking too much for us to assume your position is the same nuanced and ration position we're each thinking of.

Just say what you mean.
October 2, 2025 at 12:32 AM