Makes sense. My thinking has just been that getting Eze was the January signing gambled early. But considering the fees, we keep things reasonable to add as many as we did. And we don't know how Berta treats a January window.

I know he had some injury problems himself hence him dropping out of the contention, but I wonder if the feeling is Nichols won't make it with us and Salmon is obviously the one, but it's his age that's the worry. But hey, could be the making of them even if for Josh it's to earn a move.

He maybe possibly even go three at the back if worried, not that I think he would. I agree on Norgaard. I never realised he played some games for Brentford there before. Would rather the kids get a crack than another Partey at RB (although I know Partey played games for Atleti there).

I know Nichols had an injury that set him back, but he seemed close to the fringes. I wonder if Salmon is ahead though, just worry with him being so young.

Mental as in how Spursy it is.

I thought we'd do no business at all next month, but with our injuries we may need something.

Yeah that's what I thought he would have gone with. I saw he said it was a risk giving Saliba the full game. He'd probably be the potential right back cover until White is back if Timber was to get a knock. Before the kids.

I should say I'm not saying you are wrong, just interested what you would have gone with.

Cue the twats saying 'yeah but that's because they have won something'; as if the narratives will change if we do win the title. They will just continue on or they will find another thing to harp on about.