Claire's Trans Talks
@clairestranstalks.bsky.social
Vigilante Data Scientist.
Education, Research & Advocacy about & for Transgender & Non-Binary People. Views my own.
https://linktr.ee/CTransTalks
Education, Research & Advocacy about & for Transgender & Non-Binary People. Views my own.
https://linktr.ee/CTransTalks
Ive also identified a few areas where additional FOIs may prove revealing.
So - thats it from me for now.
More possibly over the weekend.
Take a deep breath and go enjoy your xmas folks.
/end
So - thats it from me for now.
More possibly over the weekend.
Take a deep breath and go enjoy your xmas folks.
/end
December 18, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Ive also identified a few areas where additional FOIs may prove revealing.
So - thats it from me for now.
More possibly over the weekend.
Take a deep breath and go enjoy your xmas folks.
/end
So - thats it from me for now.
More possibly over the weekend.
Take a deep breath and go enjoy your xmas folks.
/end
the ramifications of which are unclear until we see new service specs & guidelines on how NHSE intend to tie these together.
I cant see this being quick, but will probably start and see the first aspects of big changes, like local hubs, in 12-24 months.
6/
I cant see this being quick, but will probably start and see the first aspects of big changes, like local hubs, in 12-24 months.
6/
December 18, 2025 at 7:32 PM
the ramifications of which are unclear until we see new service specs & guidelines on how NHSE intend to tie these together.
I cant see this being quick, but will probably start and see the first aspects of big changes, like local hubs, in 12-24 months.
6/
I cant see this being quick, but will probably start and see the first aspects of big changes, like local hubs, in 12-24 months.
6/
Its clear some NHS trusts and mangement / trustees need to be replaced, immediately.
So watch for changes in high level people going and replacements coming in.
Overall though, what we see is a lot of tinkering around the edges,
5/
So watch for changes in high level people going and replacements coming in.
Overall though, what we see is a lot of tinkering around the edges,
5/
December 18, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Its clear some NHS trusts and mangement / trustees need to be replaced, immediately.
So watch for changes in high level people going and replacements coming in.
Overall though, what we see is a lot of tinkering around the edges,
5/
So watch for changes in high level people going and replacements coming in.
Overall though, what we see is a lot of tinkering around the edges,
5/
Theres a few potential positives as well, handled and implemented the right way.
Overall i felt like the review itself was extremely damning of both the clinics and governance - some of which I would class as medically and possibly criminally negligent.
4/
Overall i felt like the review itself was extremely damning of both the clinics and governance - some of which I would class as medically and possibly criminally negligent.
4/
December 18, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Theres a few potential positives as well, handled and implemented the right way.
Overall i felt like the review itself was extremely damning of both the clinics and governance - some of which I would class as medically and possibly criminally negligent.
4/
Overall i felt like the review itself was extremely damning of both the clinics and governance - some of which I would class as medically and possibly criminally negligent.
4/
The proof of this is not so much in the Review itself - but what the NHS decides to implement instead.
There is still scope for some extended f&ckery.
We neex to keep a close eye on the service spec changes and actions / composition of the oversight board gping forwards.
3/
There is still scope for some extended f&ckery.
We neex to keep a close eye on the service spec changes and actions / composition of the oversight board gping forwards.
3/
December 18, 2025 at 7:32 PM
The proof of this is not so much in the Review itself - but what the NHS decides to implement instead.
There is still scope for some extended f&ckery.
We neex to keep a close eye on the service spec changes and actions / composition of the oversight board gping forwards.
3/
There is still scope for some extended f&ckery.
We neex to keep a close eye on the service spec changes and actions / composition of the oversight board gping forwards.
3/
Work that should have been done by the LGBTQ+ and Trans specific orgs a long time ago.
That work will evolve and continue so we can track the impact of changes the NHS introduces following Levy.
That said, I share many of the concerns others have already raised.
2/
That work will evolve and continue so we can track the impact of changes the NHS introduces following Levy.
That said, I share many of the concerns others have already raised.
2/
December 18, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Work that should have been done by the LGBTQ+ and Trans specific orgs a long time ago.
That work will evolve and continue so we can track the impact of changes the NHS introduces following Levy.
That said, I share many of the concerns others have already raised.
2/
That work will evolve and continue so we can track the impact of changes the NHS introduces following Levy.
That said, I share many of the concerns others have already raised.
2/
Probably wise. Im wading through it now.
Some very interesting stuff.
Some very interesting stuff.
December 18, 2025 at 3:22 PM
Probably wise. Im wading through it now.
Some very interesting stuff.
Some very interesting stuff.
It was due Jan / Feb...this year, iirc.
But Deadly Wesley can go jump off a short pier.
But Deadly Wesley can go jump off a short pier.
December 18, 2025 at 2:01 PM
It was due Jan / Feb...this year, iirc.
But Deadly Wesley can go jump off a short pier.
But Deadly Wesley can go jump off a short pier.
Thank you!
December 18, 2025 at 1:02 PM
Thank you!
Nah tis fine, honestly!
December 18, 2025 at 12:48 PM
Nah tis fine, honestly!
Heh! I get that, but i wouldnt say anything unless Ive had it backed up by multiple trusted sources.
December 18, 2025 at 12:34 PM
Heh! I get that, but i wouldnt say anything unless Ive had it backed up by multiple trusted sources.
I mean, their OpSec is generally lousy and Cass leaked like a sieve.
December 18, 2025 at 12:12 PM
I mean, their OpSec is generally lousy and Cass leaked like a sieve.
Essentially - whatever works, right?
December 18, 2025 at 12:12 PM
Essentially - whatever works, right?
Im taking the silence in media etc so far as a small positive.
The scope of Levy was quite limited, so unless its gone massively off piste im not expecting anything too earth shattering.
The scope of Levy was quite limited, so unless its gone massively off piste im not expecting anything too earth shattering.
December 18, 2025 at 12:11 PM
Im taking the silence in media etc so far as a small positive.
The scope of Levy was quite limited, so unless its gone massively off piste im not expecting anything too earth shattering.
The scope of Levy was quite limited, so unless its gone massively off piste im not expecting anything too earth shattering.
Multiple trusted sources.
December 18, 2025 at 11:56 AM
Multiple trusted sources.
I believe so.
December 18, 2025 at 11:53 AM
I believe so.
Theres going to be the usual - some reading total doom & pronouncing theyve won, others denying that, partial reads & skimming, stuff taken out of context.
My advice - ignore it all until level heads have had a chance to go through it.
My advice - ignore it all until level heads have had a chance to go through it.
December 18, 2025 at 11:46 AM
Theres going to be the usual - some reading total doom & pronouncing theyve won, others denying that, partial reads & skimming, stuff taken out of context.
My advice - ignore it all until level heads have had a chance to go through it.
My advice - ignore it all until level heads have had a chance to go through it.
Theres no grand plan, or 'trap'
Its a purely reactionary response that might gain some political goodwill for Starmer.
And it wont work because any findings will be watered down to uselessness at the point of introduction.
Its a purely reactionary response that might gain some political goodwill for Starmer.
And it wont work because any findings will be watered down to uselessness at the point of introduction.
December 18, 2025 at 10:25 AM
Theres no grand plan, or 'trap'
Its a purely reactionary response that might gain some political goodwill for Starmer.
And it wont work because any findings will be watered down to uselessness at the point of introduction.
Its a purely reactionary response that might gain some political goodwill for Starmer.
And it wont work because any findings will be watered down to uselessness at the point of introduction.
Lol thanks!
December 18, 2025 at 10:14 AM
Lol thanks!