Civet Duty
@civetduty.bsky.social
I sift through what’s excreted and separate the stimulating from the crap.
Also: it’s a metaphor. Relax.
Also: it’s a metaphor. Relax.
Lemme guess: she calls herself “Pro-life?”
December 2, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Lemme guess: she calls herself “Pro-life?”
“Are you sure there no such thing as bad publicity?”
- Kristin Chenowith, probably.
- Kristin Chenowith, probably.
November 17, 2025 at 9:52 PM
“Are you sure there no such thing as bad publicity?”
- Kristin Chenowith, probably.
- Kristin Chenowith, probably.
Exactly.
The GOP wanting to keep the files hidden has nothing to do with which politicians are in it, and everything to do with which donors are on it.
I’ve been screaming this from the rooftops for months, and I’d love to be wrong.
The GOP wanting to keep the files hidden has nothing to do with which politicians are in it, and everything to do with which donors are on it.
I’ve been screaming this from the rooftops for months, and I’d love to be wrong.
November 13, 2025 at 11:54 PM
Exactly.
The GOP wanting to keep the files hidden has nothing to do with which politicians are in it, and everything to do with which donors are on it.
I’ve been screaming this from the rooftops for months, and I’d love to be wrong.
The GOP wanting to keep the files hidden has nothing to do with which politicians are in it, and everything to do with which donors are on it.
I’ve been screaming this from the rooftops for months, and I’d love to be wrong.
Reposted by Civet Duty
This tweet aged like expired milk. lol
October 15, 2025 at 3:33 AM
This tweet aged like expired milk. lol
Andrew may have been part of it. It’s certainly vast. But protecting the gravy train is likely the highest priority.
October 13, 2025 at 12:58 AM
Andrew may have been part of it. It’s certainly vast. But protecting the gravy train is likely the highest priority.
Nah, there’s no need to protect DJT. H could post a video of himself m0lest!ng a 12 year-old, and not lose any support.
I think it’s about protecting the donors on the list. They would face actual consequences, then the money would dry up.
I think it’s about protecting the donors on the list. They would face actual consequences, then the money would dry up.
October 11, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Nah, there’s no need to protect DJT. H could post a video of himself m0lest!ng a 12 year-old, and not lose any support.
I think it’s about protecting the donors on the list. They would face actual consequences, then the money would dry up.
I think it’s about protecting the donors on the list. They would face actual consequences, then the money would dry up.