Honored to be a Desmos Fellow, Cohort 3!
Here’s a link to an interactive Geogebra applet by Matthew Ziegler that I ran across YEARS ago that demonstrates this graphical approach ☺️
www.geogebra.org/m/QHgYSXT4
Here’s a link to an interactive Geogebra applet by Matthew Ziegler that I ran across YEARS ago that demonstrates this graphical approach ☺️
www.geogebra.org/m/QHgYSXT4
Strands #567
“Stand by me”
🟡🔵🔵🔵
🔵🔵
🤷♀️🤞☺️
Strands #567
“Stand by me”
🟡🔵🔵🔵
🔵🔵
🤷♀️🤞☺️
Would both blue and red be on an upward trend? 🤔🤷♀️
Would both blue and red be on an upward trend? 🤔🤷♀️
I am always an advocate of making connections within a concept as well as between concepts to develop deeper understanding!
I am always an advocate of making connections within a concept as well as between concepts to develop deeper understanding!
4x9x2 is 4 groups of 9x2 (as in the original 4x18) …
or 2 groups of 4x9
(Or even 9 groups of 4x2)
Investigate how to break up that big block of 4x18 into smaller pieces 🤔🤔🤔
4x9x2 is 4 groups of 9x2 (as in the original 4x18) …
or 2 groups of 4x9
(Or even 9 groups of 4x2)
Investigate how to break up that big block of 4x18 into smaller pieces 🤔🤔🤔
How can we write that?
5x12=5x(6+6)
or 5x(10+2), etc
(Of course, I am also a strong advocate of area models for seeing these connections … big block of 5 by 12 … how can we break it into smaller pieces … how can we represent those pieces)
How can we write that?
5x12=5x(6+6)
or 5x(10+2), etc
(Of course, I am also a strong advocate of area models for seeing these connections … big block of 5 by 12 … how can we break it into smaller pieces … how can we represent those pieces)
It’s important for them to notice, for instance, the equivalence of:
5x12 and 5x6+5x6
or …
5x12 and 5x10+5x2
or …
5x12 and 5x8+5x4
even the “less friendly”
5x12 and 5x9+ 5x3
It’s important for them to notice, for instance, the equivalence of:
5x12 and 5x6+5x6
or …
5x12 and 5x10+5x2
or …
5x12 and 5x8+5x4
even the “less friendly”
5x12 and 5x9+ 5x3
Retired HS / MS math teacher
PNW
My daughter came to visit for Easter! ☺️
Retired HS / MS math teacher
PNW
My daughter came to visit for Easter! ☺️
5x26
5x(20 +6)
5x20 + 5x6
100 + 30
130
It’s the “partner” to the division!
5x26
5x(20 +6)
5x20 + 5x6
100 + 30
130
It’s the “partner” to the division!
50 + 30 is 80 … similarly, you can “add the 5 and 3” only because they represent 5 tens and 3 tens.
5x + 3x = 8x because there are
“5 x’s and 3 x’s”
50 + 30 is 80 … similarly, you can “add the 5 and 3” only because they represent 5 tens and 3 tens.
5x + 3x = 8x because there are
“5 x’s and 3 x’s”
COMMUNICATION!
COMMUNICATION!
I wonder if students are done a disservice by always focusing on “starting with the ones”
I wonder if students are done a disservice by always focusing on “starting with the ones”
(20+7)(30+3) it becomes almost as rote as the traditional algorithm… 🤔🤔🤔
I like that I can mentally calculate 33x3, but not 33x7 … but 27 is 3 less than 30, so …
(30-3)x33 is
30x33 - 3x33
990 - 99
990 - 90 - 9
900 - 9
891
(20+7)(30+3) it becomes almost as rote as the traditional algorithm… 🤔🤔🤔
I like that I can mentally calculate 33x3, but not 33x7 … but 27 is 3 less than 30, so …
(30-3)x33 is
30x33 - 3x33
990 - 99
990 - 90 - 9
900 - 9
891
8x125 is 1000
(2x125=250, and 4 of those is 1000, but also 1/8=0.125, sticks in my head)
Then there’s just one more 8, so 1008
8x125 is 1000
(2x125=250, and 4 of those is 1000, but also 1/8=0.125, sticks in my head)
Then there’s just one more 8, so 1008
Breaking one factor into “more parts” might seem like “more work,” but not if they are “friendlier pieces.”
Breaking one factor into “more parts” might seem like “more work,” but not if they are “friendlier pieces.”
Are you implying that kids “know where the vowel goes” and “knows how clauses work” by age five? Aren’t those concepts learned at school?
Are you implying that kids “know where the vowel goes” and “knows how clauses work” by age five? Aren’t those concepts learned at school?
What do the hens “do” ? 🤔🤔🤔
What do the hens “do” ? 🤔🤔🤔
104 - 44 …
104 - 4 = 100, then
100 - 40 = 60
But since it was really only 103, the result is one less, so 59
104 - 44 …
104 - 4 = 100, then
100 - 40 = 60
But since it was really only 103, the result is one less, so 59
Step 4 would have 4 rows of 3 flowers as well as just 3 “sticking out of the top” (4x3+3)
Step 25 would have 25 rows of 3 flowers and 24 more flowers sticking up at the top.” (25x3 + 24)
Step 4 would have 4 rows of 3 flowers as well as just 3 “sticking out of the top” (4x3+3)
Step 25 would have 25 rows of 3 flowers and 24 more flowers sticking up at the top.” (25x3 + 24)