Just reread Charlie Wilson's War. That's the lesson of only worrying about the immediate problem in front of you (1980s USSR payback) without regard for the ripple effects (post-occupation power vacuum/ rise of Taliban after the mujahideen following the Soviet pullout).
Just reread Charlie Wilson's War. That's the lesson of only worrying about the immediate problem in front of you (1980s USSR payback) without regard for the ripple effects (post-occupation power vacuum/ rise of Taliban after the mujahideen following the Soviet pullout).
Now, finally, "I never said they were saints"
No shit. It's Iran. (Acknowledging that fact doesn't make Israel good)
Now, finally, "I never said they were saints"
No shit. It's Iran. (Acknowledging that fact doesn't make Israel good)
And you knew that.
And you knew that.
"How does Israel's actions make the Iranian regime not bad?" One doesn't affect the other, that's child-like reasoning.
Israeli atrocities don't absolve Iran of its sins or allow claims like "Iran respects human life."
"How does Israel's actions make the Iranian regime not bad?" One doesn't affect the other, that's child-like reasoning.
Israeli atrocities don't absolve Iran of its sins or allow claims like "Iran respects human life."
1. in no way supported by the documented acts of the regime since it's ascension in 1979.
2. The overall crux of your fallacious reasoning.
1. in no way supported by the documented acts of the regime since it's ascension in 1979.
2. The overall crux of your fallacious reasoning.
Your assertion that unlike Israel, Iran respecta human life is absurd
Your assertion that unlike Israel, Iran respecta human life is absurd
The entire argument is essentially "Larry is fatter than me, therefore I am not fat."
Israel is clearly not respecting human life/rights, but to say that means Iran does is absurd (see original post).
The entire argument is essentially "Larry is fatter than me, therefore I am not fat."
Israel is clearly not respecting human life/rights, but to say that means Iran does is absurd (see original post).
Source: "trust me bro"
aka -
"Ipse Dixit"= A claim that is presented as true without evidence, as self-evident, while still not actually established.
Source: "trust me bro"
aka -
"Ipse Dixit"= A claim that is presented as true without evidence, as self-evident, while still not actually established.
The heavily implied point is your statement about Iran showing concern for human life (or human rights) is not supported by basic facts.
It has nothing to do with Israel also being trigger happy. Both are true. It isn't a false choice/dichotomy -dilemma
Logical fallacies abound.
The heavily implied point is your statement about Iran showing concern for human life (or human rights) is not supported by basic facts.
It has nothing to do with Israel also being trigger happy. Both are true. It isn't a false choice/dichotomy -dilemma
Logical fallacies abound.
Huh. That's... a lot.
"Hey, Siri/Google... Now show me news articles about the US or Israel executing people for being gay."
**no search results**
Have a nice day in your fantasy world.
Huh. That's... a lot.
"Hey, Siri/Google... Now show me news articles about the US or Israel executing people for being gay."
**no search results**
Have a nice day in your fantasy world.
😐
😐
Companies using this ad strategy are taking sides with this "neutral" crap
Companies using this ad strategy are taking sides with this "neutral" crap