All views my own.
Despite evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness of polypills, no manufacturer has invested the millions of $$$ required to gain FDA approval. Hopefully, this study will signal demand for the cardiovascular polypill to policymakers and manufacturers.
Despite evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness of polypills, no manufacturer has invested the millions of $$$ required to gain FDA approval. Hopefully, this study will signal demand for the cardiovascular polypill to policymakers and manufacturers.
It also yielded more QALYs and lower ICERs among poorer individuals, suggesting the polypill could cost-effectively reduce income-related health inequalities.
It also yielded more QALYs and lower ICERs among poorer individuals, suggesting the polypill could cost-effectively reduce income-related health inequalities.
For a trial-representative cohort of 100,000 individuals, compared to usual care, polypill treatment:
- prevented 2,738 CVD events
- yielded 1,190 QALYs
- increased costs by ~$10,152,000
Hence, polypill treatment cost $8,560-per-QALY gained and was high value.
For a trial-representative cohort of 100,000 individuals, compared to usual care, polypill treatment:
- prevented 2,738 CVD events
- yielded 1,190 QALYs
- increased costs by ~$10,152,000
Hence, polypill treatment cost $8,560-per-QALY gained and was high value.