.˚⊹cat fionola‧₊˚⤾ 🌸🎀
banner
catoochie.bsky.social
.˚⊹cat fionola‧₊˚⤾ 🌸🎀
@catoochie.bsky.social
🌸🍄🎀🦋🦄🌼
feminist | writer | loud mouth
find my essays on substack
catoochie.online
https://ko-fi.com/catoochie
i've been hearing over and over again how current olympic athletes have 2 olympic gold medalist parents and olympic athlete grandparents.... and no one cares.
February 12, 2026 at 5:44 AM
Reposted by .˚⊹cat fionola‧₊˚⤾ 🌸🎀
your vote has weight outside of election day. regardless of how you end up voting, until then you can bargain with it. the lesser evils are watching you, if you promise your vote for nothing you'll get nothing. say you wont vote for bad candidates. say you'll only vote for policies you like
February 12, 2026 at 12:20 AM
to be clear, this mindset already applies to women that don’t fall in line with the broodmare trad wife archetype. we know this, we see it all the time. for the sake of addressing this specific person though, you get the point.
February 11, 2026 at 10:59 PM
liberal and (yes) leftist movements notoriously shoot themselves in the foot due to their disdain for feminism and refusal to unlearn basic misogyny.

you will never win if you treat women as a disposable side character. there can be no liberation without women’s liberation.
February 11, 2026 at 10:54 PM
and what’s the problem here if this woman is a nazi?

it’s a problem because this never applies only to “bad women.” this can just as easily become any woman who doesn’t pop out enough babies or women who don’t put out. this can become any feminist or woman who defies patriarchy.
February 11, 2026 at 10:49 PM
person is obviously stupid, but let’s unpack:

- if you don’t want to be classified - from the 50s and 60s

this means all women must prove their worthiness of basic rights. if you act out of turn, you deserve misogyny, sexual exploitation, financial abuse etc.

bsky.app/profile/cdst...
I shall say, if you don’t want to be classified like you would be back in the 50’s or 60’s, than don’t act like it. She came out raging. She was not a bit professional. She made a fool of herself. She gave women a very bad look. And if you’re angry about it maybe you ought to look in the mirror
February 11, 2026 at 10:49 PM
Reposted by .˚⊹cat fionola‧₊˚⤾ 🌸🎀
February 10, 2026 at 4:52 PM
where did i say rightfully? again, just making things up while you refuse to engage in what i'm actually saying. we are in the replies about stancil, but what i replied to YOU only had to do with YOU. you simply don't want to engage in a real discussion so you turn it into "discourse"
February 10, 2026 at 7:32 PM
further, assuming that this is a one way info exchange is absurd. despite how stupid you think these people are, it makes no sense for someone to give this guy info for absolutely nothing in exchange except to be outed on bluesky. i need yall to be serious for once.
February 10, 2026 at 7:22 PM
funny i said nothing about stancils info or stancil in general, i responded to you and something you said. however, again, assuming he knows the names of no other observers is an idiotic assumption seeing as he was filming their faces and got punched for it, then posted it. he has already disclosed.
February 10, 2026 at 7:22 PM
my original statement stands. more than half is not all, and you're making dangerous assumptions.
February 10, 2026 at 7:18 PM
this is naive. ICE has existed since 2003 in a post 9/11 world. the new recruits are absolutely stupid, but to assume everyone within the organization has no experience is a dumb idea that will get people killed.
February 10, 2026 at 7:14 PM