Catio Miles
@catiomiles.bsky.social
Liberal. Economics. Governance.
Making the argument for Britain’s return at the heart of Europe.
Making the argument for Britain’s return at the heart of Europe.
?
Those are facts.
Facts are facts, they are not right wing or left wing.
Those are facts.
Facts are facts, they are not right wing or left wing.
November 30, 2025 at 7:14 PM
?
Those are facts.
Facts are facts, they are not right wing or left wing.
Those are facts.
Facts are facts, they are not right wing or left wing.
Reposted by Catio Miles
Based on an analysis done by the economist, among Britain’s chancellors, Rachel Reeves is the mudslinging champion by a country mile.
November 30, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Based on an analysis done by the economist, among Britain’s chancellors, Rachel Reeves is the mudslinging champion by a country mile.
Based on an analysis done by the economist, among Britain’s chancellors, Rachel Reeves is the mudslinging champion by a country mile.
November 30, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Based on an analysis done by the economist, among Britain’s chancellors, Rachel Reeves is the mudslinging champion by a country mile.
Who has the obligation under US law to investigate and potentially charge for these alleged crimes?
November 30, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Who has the obligation under US law to investigate and potentially charge for these alleged crimes?
And how is that relevant to policies?
November 30, 2025 at 6:39 PM
And how is that relevant to policies?
Rees Mogg said we need 100 years to see some positive impact…
November 30, 2025 at 10:09 AM
Rees Mogg said we need 100 years to see some positive impact…
I think their argument is a public health one?
which is to tax more every additional alcohol unit in order to decrease overall alcohol consumption?
Or I got this wrong?
Thank you.
which is to tax more every additional alcohol unit in order to decrease overall alcohol consumption?
Or I got this wrong?
Thank you.
November 30, 2025 at 9:45 AM
I think their argument is a public health one?
which is to tax more every additional alcohol unit in order to decrease overall alcohol consumption?
Or I got this wrong?
Thank you.
which is to tax more every additional alcohol unit in order to decrease overall alcohol consumption?
Or I got this wrong?
Thank you.