Casper
@caspery.bsky.social
Well, those that disagree are headed somewhere else in the next couple decades. ;)
November 26, 2025 at 6:22 AM
Well, those that disagree are headed somewhere else in the next couple decades. ;)
That’s untrue. Otherwise, this whole Trump thing would have been avoided without the Clinton hero worship.
November 25, 2025 at 9:31 PM
That’s untrue. Otherwise, this whole Trump thing would have been avoided without the Clinton hero worship.
"She should run for Senate" just means you're happy with a status quo candidate.
November 25, 2025 at 7:26 PM
"She should run for Senate" just means you're happy with a status quo candidate.
She has the option of changing the national discourse and saving the party from its corrupt, corporate self.
Or just becoming a Senator.
Or just becoming a Senator.
November 25, 2025 at 7:25 PM
She has the option of changing the national discourse and saving the party from its corrupt, corporate self.
Or just becoming a Senator.
Or just becoming a Senator.
Then AOC defeats Buttigieg in a landslide. Party don't want that.
November 25, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Then AOC defeats Buttigieg in a landslide. Party don't want that.
We'll gladly let the fucker lose.
November 25, 2025 at 7:06 PM
We'll gladly let the fucker lose.
Those were two right-of-center cunts and one of them actually won the popular vote (so there goes your stupid argument).
November 25, 2025 at 7:05 PM
Those were two right-of-center cunts and one of them actually won the popular vote (so there goes your stupid argument).
AOC running for the nomination, win or lose, will do more to push the party Left than her making a lateral move over to the Senate. Only braindead libs want that to happen.
She runs for the nomination, she's guaranteed 2nd place at worse via The Left.
She runs for the nomination, she's guaranteed 2nd place at worse via The Left.
November 25, 2025 at 7:04 PM
AOC running for the nomination, win or lose, will do more to push the party Left than her making a lateral move over to the Senate. Only braindead libs want that to happen.
She runs for the nomination, she's guaranteed 2nd place at worse via The Left.
She runs for the nomination, she's guaranteed 2nd place at worse via The Left.
No Kings Day was millions of elderly, committed MSNBC viewers who vote in every election, lol.
November 25, 2025 at 6:59 PM
No Kings Day was millions of elderly, committed MSNBC viewers who vote in every election, lol.
LOL. Clearly you just want to start World War III.
November 25, 2025 at 6:56 PM
LOL. Clearly you just want to start World War III.
It’s insane how big the spread is between the national and statewide polls for her. Her numbers are abysmal in all the state polls.
November 25, 2025 at 3:02 PM
It’s insane how big the spread is between the national and statewide polls for her. Her numbers are abysmal in all the state polls.
"Wall Street thieves/billionaire class."
So is the Democratic Party for fuck's sake.
So is the Democratic Party for fuck's sake.
November 24, 2025 at 8:38 AM
"Wall Street thieves/billionaire class."
So is the Democratic Party for fuck's sake.
So is the Democratic Party for fuck's sake.
Delegate allocation is easy. Narrow it down to the final two and then distribute the delegates via the statewide results. Problem solved. If second place didn’t even clear 15% in a two-way (a very small ask), then let the winner take all.
November 24, 2025 at 7:31 AM
Delegate allocation is easy. Narrow it down to the final two and then distribute the delegates via the statewide results. Problem solved. If second place didn’t even clear 15% in a two-way (a very small ask), then let the winner take all.
Well, guess that rules out Gavin then - super blue California or Pete - Mayor of the Berkeley of Indiana
November 24, 2025 at 3:33 AM
Well, guess that rules out Gavin then - super blue California or Pete - Mayor of the Berkeley of Indiana
1) Sanders polled better than Hillary in Trump match-ups throughout 2016. Acting like Democrat voters are some geniuses about electability is laughable.
2) My point is that you don’t need a consensus to win the primaries. You can win it with a relatively small share of vote thanks to 15% threshold
2) My point is that you don’t need a consensus to win the primaries. You can win it with a relatively small share of vote thanks to 15% threshold
November 24, 2025 at 3:32 AM
1) Sanders polled better than Hillary in Trump match-ups throughout 2016. Acting like Democrat voters are some geniuses about electability is laughable.
2) My point is that you don’t need a consensus to win the primaries. You can win it with a relatively small share of vote thanks to 15% threshold
2) My point is that you don’t need a consensus to win the primaries. You can win it with a relatively small share of vote thanks to 15% threshold
Establishment Dems showed their true colors with both the endless genocide support and leaving Mamdani out to dry
November 24, 2025 at 2:35 AM
Establishment Dems showed their true colors with both the endless genocide support and leaving Mamdani out to dry
AOC. Actually excites people. Will have the largest number of donors/volunteers and biggest crowds in 2028 primary field (just like Bernie 2020).
Or you can just give the finger to The Left and we’ll act accordingly. Funny how we’re supposed to always bend the knee.
Or you can just give the finger to The Left and we’ll act accordingly. Funny how we’re supposed to always bend the knee.
November 24, 2025 at 2:35 AM
AOC. Actually excites people. Will have the largest number of donors/volunteers and biggest crowds in 2028 primary field (just like Bernie 2020).
Or you can just give the finger to The Left and we’ll act accordingly. Funny how we’re supposed to always bend the knee.
Or you can just give the finger to The Left and we’ll act accordingly. Funny how we’re supposed to always bend the knee.
Exactly. AOC 2028 would be the first woman to be a Dem nominee for President because the other two were cunts. :)
November 24, 2025 at 2:33 AM
Exactly. AOC 2028 would be the first woman to be a Dem nominee for President because the other two were cunts. :)
1) Someone can get just 40% of the vote on Super Tuesday and then have an insurmuntable delegate lead (see: Biden 2020 who did even worse than that).
2) The primary vote does not equal the general electorate. Party should be focused on hard to get voters, not MSNBCers who like Newsom’s Tweets
2) The primary vote does not equal the general electorate. Party should be focused on hard to get voters, not MSNBCers who like Newsom’s Tweets
November 24, 2025 at 1:54 AM
1) Someone can get just 40% of the vote on Super Tuesday and then have an insurmuntable delegate lead (see: Biden 2020 who did even worse than that).
2) The primary vote does not equal the general electorate. Party should be focused on hard to get voters, not MSNBCers who like Newsom’s Tweets
2) The primary vote does not equal the general electorate. Party should be focused on hard to get voters, not MSNBCers who like Newsom’s Tweets
“Surely (insert neoliberal here) will bridge the divide by giving progressives none of what they want along with a genocide”
November 23, 2025 at 9:16 PM
“Surely (insert neoliberal here) will bridge the divide by giving progressives none of what they want along with a genocide”