thanks! I haven't tried using claude for it yet, I wasn't sure how much code would be out there for it to have learned from. and will go through that track
November 7, 2025 at 5:34 PM
thanks! I haven't tried using claude for it yet, I wasn't sure how much code would be out there for it to have learned from. and will go through that track
loving the Gleam libraries! Did you have any resources you found especially helpful for learning gleam?
November 7, 2025 at 5:08 PM
loving the Gleam libraries! Did you have any resources you found especially helpful for learning gleam?
and, to play devil's advocate, might not have the annual carbon footprint of a medium sized country
November 3, 2025 at 6:29 PM
and, to play devil's advocate, might not have the annual carbon footprint of a medium sized country
Im saying that by defining dislikes as public that setting would be the behavior for everyone.
November 3, 2025 at 3:10 AM
Im saying that by defining dislikes as public that setting would be the behavior for everyone.
A block is on an account. A dislike is on a piece of content. with a public dislike am creating a backlink to content I specifically do not endorse
November 3, 2025 at 3:08 AM
A block is on an account. A dislike is on a piece of content. with a public dislike am creating a backlink to content I specifically do not endorse
Let’s say I dont want to see graphic content on my feed. Public dislikes, by definition, associate my account with the graphic content I don’t want to see.
November 3, 2025 at 12:32 AM
Let’s say I dont want to see graphic content on my feed. Public dislikes, by definition, associate my account with the graphic content I don’t want to see.
But by making dislikes public on the protocol, you are making that decision for everyone, not just yourself
November 3, 2025 at 12:29 AM
But by making dislikes public on the protocol, you are making that decision for everyone, not just yourself
I can see how this would expose people to harassment though. easy to imagine the first bot that will be built will be “posts disliked by bluesky team members.” So now that prevents them from tailoring their own feeds for fear of backlash
November 2, 2025 at 6:47 PM
I can see how this would expose people to harassment though. easy to imagine the first bot that will be built will be “posts disliked by bluesky team members.” So now that prevents them from tailoring their own feeds for fear of backlash
Im gonna disagree here, I think dislikes are inherently a bit more personal than likes and my intuition is they should be private by default. It reduces the ability of people to personalize their feeds as they desire if the personalization mechanism is open to the public and its scrutiny
November 2, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Im gonna disagree here, I think dislikes are inherently a bit more personal than likes and my intuition is they should be private by default. It reduces the ability of people to personalize their feeds as they desire if the personalization mechanism is open to the public and its scrutiny
Maybe it does or doesn't. But the fact that anyone can hop onto Sora and generate these videos and post them on the internet makes the issue susceptible to virality in a way that increases the likelihood of the average person being exposed to false information by orders of magnitude
November 1, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Maybe it does or doesn't. But the fact that anyone can hop onto Sora and generate these videos and post them on the internet makes the issue susceptible to virality in a way that increases the likelihood of the average person being exposed to false information by orders of magnitude
I am not being facetious, I am having trouble grasping how this tech, if not regulated, will impact society without being ruinous. How can we function as a democracy if we corporations are allowed to beam falsehoods they generate and/or incentivize directly into the retinas of voters?
November 1, 2025 at 3:53 PM
I am not being facetious, I am having trouble grasping how this tech, if not regulated, will impact society without being ruinous. How can we function as a democracy if we corporations are allowed to beam falsehoods they generate and/or incentivize directly into the retinas of voters?
Those examples are literally libelous if done with malicious intent, yes. Andrew Cuomo is airing advertisements that contain AI-generated footage of Zohran Mamdani saying things he didn't say. What happens if Larry Ellison buys TikTok and allows that kind of thing to run rampant? It's poisonous, no?
November 1, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Those examples are literally libelous if done with malicious intent, yes. Andrew Cuomo is airing advertisements that contain AI-generated footage of Zohran Mamdani saying things he didn't say. What happens if Larry Ellison buys TikTok and allows that kind of thing to run rampant? It's poisonous, no?
There must be some sort of recourse for how to deal with AI-generated videos that impersonate another person and make it look like they said something they never said though, right? Or use their likeness for other nefarious purposes?
November 1, 2025 at 3:34 PM
There must be some sort of recourse for how to deal with AI-generated videos that impersonate another person and make it look like they said something they never said though, right? Or use their likeness for other nefarious purposes?
the more specific subs can be ok. I have found r/golang to be reasonable. it's the sweet spot of size and moderation. in general the quality of most subreddits have declined greatly over the past ~5 years to the point where it's not worth it
November 1, 2025 at 2:16 PM
the more specific subs can be ok. I have found r/golang to be reasonable. it's the sweet spot of size and moderation. in general the quality of most subreddits have declined greatly over the past ~5 years to the point where it's not worth it
This is excellent, thank you for sharing
October 31, 2025 at 1:18 AM
This is excellent, thank you for sharing
I do feel like there is a frontloading of these types of decisions architecturally when building an atproto app that I’m struggling with
October 29, 2025 at 4:21 PM
I do feel like there is a frontloading of these types of decisions architecturally when building an atproto app that I’m struggling with
Since its just a redirect you can remove the @ for go
October 29, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Since its just a redirect you can remove the @ for go
Theyre probably going to remove it tangled.org/@tangled.org...
Remove @ in tangled URLs #245
Currently something like https://tangled.org/xan.lol/xan.lol redirects to https://tangled.org/@xan.lol/xan.lol, when it might make more sense for that to be the other way around! Some reasons:
1. it d...
tangled.org
October 29, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Theyre probably going to remove it tangled.org/@tangled.org...
But I would love to know if this is not idiomatic atproto
October 20, 2025 at 4:31 PM
But I would love to know if this is not idiomatic atproto
The way I have been thinking about it is to have an API endpoint for the client to notify to pull from the PDS, so push instead of pull, to reduce latency and also prevent clogging up the PDS with e.g. individual chess moves. So the only record would be the final scoreboard which shows a game log
October 20, 2025 at 4:31 PM
The way I have been thinking about it is to have an API endpoint for the client to notify to pull from the PDS, so push instead of pull, to reduce latency and also prevent clogging up the PDS with e.g. individual chess moves. So the only record would be the final scoreboard which shows a game log
Im working on similar turn based games. I guess a key question is what is the latency of the firehose/jetstream
October 20, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Im working on similar turn based games. I guess a key question is what is the latency of the firehose/jetstream
Ive been thinking about this too. Noob question, is it definitely better to listen to the firehose/jetstream than to plug directly into the user’s PDS?
October 20, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Ive been thinking about this too. Noob question, is it definitely better to listen to the firehose/jetstream than to plug directly into the user’s PDS?