Bryan Culbertson 🥄
banner
bryanculbertson.com
Bryan Culbertson 🥄
@bryanculbertson.com
he/him

Living the car-free life in Oakland, CA. Don't make me drive.

https://mastodon.social/@bryanculbertson
That's great to hear! Look forward to riding it when I visit my family
November 26, 2025 at 9:06 PM
That must be a mistake in the dataset. Thanks for pointing it out.
November 26, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Driving safely for the road conditions is not just the law, it is the right thing to do
November 26, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Glad you stopped in time! Make sure you are going a safe speed for the road conditions so you have time to stop in time when this happens again in the future.
November 26, 2025 at 7:09 AM
Robotaxis work best in the same places taxis work best, places with more demand than parking spots and insufficient transit service

This is now a function of density but one of infrastructure choices
November 26, 2025 at 5:57 AM
It is your responsibility as a driver to stop for kids crossing the road no matter how they decide to cross, when in doubt just go slow enough to stop if you need to

It is not a kids responsibility to behave so predictably that you can speed. Be the adult in the room and let the kids be kids.
November 26, 2025 at 5:28 AM
Can you describe in more details what you are asking, I may be missing what your question is about
November 26, 2025 at 5:21 AM
Duffy would totally support making most of society only accessible to the uber wealthy
November 26, 2025 at 12:23 AM
Waymo's road to success is to decimate transit in a city with limited parking like Chicago, DC, SF, LA, San Diego, or NYC

DC, LA, and NYC have sufficient transit funding to hold their own

Chicago is a union town

SF or SD have transit funding shortfalls and are anti-union, so are Waymo's best bets
November 25, 2025 at 9:54 PM
Sweet spot for robotaxis are ample roads, limited parking, and infrequent transit

Waymo will not entice drivers in places with excess parking, which is all suburbs and most cities

Waymo will not entice transit riders in places with robust transit which is very few cities, maybe only NYC in the US
November 25, 2025 at 9:48 PM
You need congestion pricing more for robotaxis than you do for human drivers, pricing parking is more important for human drivers

There is no need to treat robotaxis the same as human drivers, they are different things and require different regulations and taxes.
November 25, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Density helps reduce cost of providing transit, but is not necessary for viable transit

Low density Switzerland has high transit mode share because they have a funding model that sufficiently funds transit capital and operations
November 25, 2025 at 9:12 PM
A world where robotaxis get any more popular than they are is a world where every city looks like Dallas

A cap or tax on robotaxis so they stay under a 1% mode share would be an effective method to save cities
November 25, 2025 at 9:06 PM