Here are some nice gnocchi
Here are some nice gnocchi
Thanks Aaron, we’re all smarter together
Thanks Aaron, we’re all smarter together
How? Via a quiet directive in the “Invasion” Executive Order to force Homeland Security Investigations to do immigration enforcement
How? Via a quiet directive in the “Invasion” Executive Order to force Homeland Security Investigations to do immigration enforcement
Savory dish of the Thanksgiving meal, if I may say so
Savory dish of the Thanksgiving meal, if I may say so
Sure Adam, politicians have a disciplined practice of smart politics, as evidenced by you staffing your entire office with 20-somethings who definitely have the subject-matter expertise in the national legislation they’re writing
Sure Adam, politicians have a disciplined practice of smart politics, as evidenced by you staffing your entire office with 20-somethings who definitely have the subject-matter expertise in the national legislation they’re writing
But a close 2nd is its theory of change in which politicians know what issues will no longer be popular in 5 years!
But a close 2nd is its theory of change in which politicians know what issues will no longer be popular in 5 years!
The trick is that mass deportation doesn’t increase security—it concentrates power, at the cost of security for normal people. No price is too steep when someone else is paying
The trick is that mass deportation doesn’t increase security—it concentrates power, at the cost of security for normal people. No price is too steep when someone else is paying
publicconsultation.org/ss-immigrati...
publicconsultation.org/ss-immigrati...
(Dems are 75-14 in it)
publicconsultation.org/ss-immigrati...
(Dems are 75-14 in it)
publicconsultation.org/ss-immigrati...
In academia, the move he pulls on Tamsin Shaw (quoted) is masculinist dismissiveness—reading uncharitably, mischaracterizing the argument, so as to suggest that nothing of value is to be found in her essay
In academia, the move he pulls on Tamsin Shaw (quoted) is masculinist dismissiveness—reading uncharitably, mischaracterizing the argument, so as to suggest that nothing of value is to be found in her essay
Biden & Hillary Clinton started referring to Trump as “a unique threat to democracy” because of (1) belief, (2) electoral advantage, but also (3) because of the outcomes of debates w/in the Democratic Party
Biden & Hillary Clinton started referring to Trump as “a unique threat to democracy” because of (1) belief, (2) electoral advantage, but also (3) because of the outcomes of debates w/in the Democratic Party
Very hard to do good immigration policy when the Washington Post treats actual immigration like political reporting: Side A claims X, Side B claims Y, no further investigation needed.
(It’s all home country dynamics)
Very hard to do good immigration policy when the Washington Post treats actual immigration like political reporting: Side A claims X, Side B claims Y, no further investigation needed.
(It’s all home country dynamics)