Mark Thakkar
banner
brunellus.com
Mark Thakkar
@brunellus.com
Medieval Latinist · Postdoc in the History of Maths, Logic and Philosophy, working on Cardano, the impossible and the medievals: https://i2erc.wordpress.com
Very unusually, this is for pleasure! I’m off to Copenhagen to see Radiohead 😀
November 29, 2025 at 2:02 PM
No worries! The pedagogical habit is too ingrained for me to just provide a transcription, but I will add that ‘hu.’ looks like a non-standard abbreviation of ‘huius’, and that the next word agreed with it. (This brought to you from a coach to Heathrow, so should come with a slight caveat.)
November 29, 2025 at 1:02 PM
It does indeed!
November 29, 2025 at 12:48 PM
Of course! I didn’t mean the whole article.
November 29, 2025 at 7:06 AM
I can believe it – people have obviously been scrambling to publish on LLMs, so a bit of duplication is no surprise. As long as they’re making good points, the more the merrier!
November 28, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Mind you, Wyclif got there first on LLMs being indifferent to the truth (“non curat sive vera sive falsa dixerit”) and their outputs being bullshit (“qui nutriebantur in croceis amplexati sunt stercora”) despite the occasional truth (“quandoque vera balbuciat per accidens”). bsky.app/profile/brun...
New Wyclif polemic discovered! Only 250 words long, but not obviously detached from a larger work. It isn’t ascribed to him in the manuscript (no titulus or colophon) but the style is recognizably his. I’m posting it here because the content is eerily topical. #medievalLatin #medievalSky #genAI
November 28, 2025 at 6:25 PM
November 24, 2025 at 9:31 PM
I’d never thought to try Biblissima instead of Gallica! After a quick experiment, I can see how it would be quicker. Less fussy download process for a single page, too.
November 24, 2025 at 8:26 PM
Complaint shamelessly lifted from the third comment here (archive link because Roger's site is currently down, lack of shame because the comment was mine in the first place): web.archive.org/web/20250419...
How to find a specific manuscript by shelfmark at the Bibliothèque Nationale Français website
The French National Library has a great mass of medieval manuscripts online at its Gallica site.  Finding them, however, can be very tricky. Some time back, a genius drew a chart of how to do this.…
web.archive.org
November 24, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Wait, had they recently replaced the one they’d had for years, whereby a search for ‘8 E XV’ would find Royal MS 8 E XV but a search for ‘8 E.XV’ wouldn’t, and (unbelievably) a search for ‘Royal 8 E’ wouldn’t find anything whereas a search for ‘Royal MS 8 E’ would? Because that one seriously sucked.
November 24, 2025 at 8:10 PM
🤣
November 21, 2025 at 1:51 PM
“What they do not offer is replacing the need to learn the basic skillset of the discipline first”. In the case of palaeography, crappy HTR is now useful in much the same way as crappy OCR of early printed books has long been useful: it can help competent researchers find needles in haystacks. (2/2)
November 20, 2025 at 10:37 AM
Yes, this! As Georgy Kantor has put it in a piece about AI: “what unites successful applications is that they allow already expert human beings, capable of evaluating and directing the work, to deal with the amounts of data which would have been unmanageable otherwise…” (1/2) x.com/GeorgyKantor...
November 20, 2025 at 10:36 AM
Good sleuthing! There may be some material for comparison in DMLBS s.vv. ‘pugnata’ and ‘pugillus’ 1. In a similar vein, there’s also ‘palmata‘ (s.v. ‘palmare‘ 6) and ‘palma‘ 2b. Agreed that the definition of Occitan ‘ponhierat‘ sounds dubious – quots or it didn’t happen! logeion.uchicago.edu/pugnata
November 20, 2025 at 10:19 AM
Thanks! Working from home as usual, but hopping the Channel (or going under it) a few times a year. A massive relief, obviously. Fingers permacrossed for something wicked to come your way too...
November 19, 2025 at 12:12 AM
Thanks! It sounds great, but I’m only 3 months into a 3-year postdoc (😌) so I’ll give it a miss. (Incidentally, there’s a bugbear of mine in the FPs: knowledge of Latin won’t be assessed via a test. I do hope the interview makes up for it, because qualifications are obviously not a reliable guide.)
November 18, 2025 at 11:53 PM
I’m afraid not! The only piece of secondary literature that comes to mind (apart from the one reviewed at the link below) is actually about Greek, though it isn’t mentioned in Tanner’s article: Peter Maxwell-Stuart, Studies in Greek Colour Terminology (2 vols 1981). bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2016/2016.03...
Color-Terms in Social and Cultural Context in Ancient Rome. Gorgias Studies in Classical and Late Antiquity, 3 – Bryn Mawr Classical Review
bmcr.brynmawr.edu
November 17, 2025 at 4:53 PM
I had to read up on χλωρός for the DMLBS entry on ‘viridis’. Thirteen years later, all I can really remember is that it’s hard to determine where the balance lies between green and yellow. Anyway, the relevant part of the entry (among others, perhaps!) is sense 6: logeion.uchicago.edu/viridis
November 15, 2025 at 7:20 AM
Also got me wondering what ain’t no country I’ve ever heard of. Checking the reds, I found only the Comoros. Confirms my suspicion that my knowledge of African countries comes from my dad’s stamp collection (Kenya c1960) where it’ll have been disguised as Madagascar: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postage...
Postage stamps and postal history of the Comoros - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
November 12, 2025 at 10:41 AM