So, the new white house spin is that Bradley - on his own - decided to commit a war crime. (Yes, a 2nd war crime but we'll leave that for now). Hegseth knew this but took no action except to promote Bradley a month later...
December 2, 2025 at 10:40 PM
So, the new white house spin is that Bradley - on his own - decided to commit a war crime. (Yes, a 2nd war crime but we'll leave that for now). Hegseth knew this but took no action except to promote Bradley a month later...
No one from the administration should ever be shown live. Need to time to fact check lies and only show statements that provide real information to viewers.
December 1, 2025 at 7:05 PM
No one from the administration should ever be shown live. Need to time to fact check lies and only show statements that provide real information to viewers.
I'm pretty sure he didn't say he'd release it. As usual, lazy reporters confused him saying he was willing to do so with him saying he would do so. Not the same thing.
December 1, 2025 at 4:15 PM
I'm pretty sure he didn't say he'd release it. As usual, lazy reporters confused him saying he was willing to do so with him saying he would do so. Not the same thing.
That is a choice by the university to keep that money outside general operations. (Mostly... in some cases profits from football do support other aspects of the universities.)
November 30, 2025 at 9:44 PM
That is a choice by the university to keep that money outside general operations. (Mostly... in some cases profits from football do support other aspects of the universities.)
The simple answer is that the football teams generate large incomes for the schools which they can pay to the coaches because they don't pay the players. (Even with NIL, the schools are still not the ones paying the players.)
November 30, 2025 at 8:58 PM
The simple answer is that the football teams generate large incomes for the schools which they can pay to the coaches because they don't pay the players. (Even with NIL, the schools are still not the ones paying the players.)
No, it is not. First, they regularly call indisputably true stories fake news, so that is basically meaningless. Second, he makes slurs without denying a single fact. Instead, claims it was legal which is a form of confirmation, not denial. If he didn't give the order, he can say so. He doesn't.
November 30, 2025 at 6:35 PM
No, it is not. First, they regularly call indisputably true stories fake news, so that is basically meaningless. Second, he makes slurs without denying a single fact. Instead, claims it was legal which is a form of confirmation, not denial. If he didn't give the order, he can say so. He doesn't.
The solution is to give people the capability to make their own choices… filter out accounts from bot locations or those using VPNs or simply those that are not verified in some fashion. Bluesky shouldn’t decide but let users do that.
November 26, 2025 at 10:48 PM
The solution is to give people the capability to make their own choices… filter out accounts from bot locations or those using VPNs or simply those that are not verified in some fashion. Bluesky shouldn’t decide but let users do that.
I have nothing against anonymity but they should ban fake anonymity or pretending to be someone else. There's nothing wrong with Liam Nissan or Tweet of God because you know they're fake. Don't allow accounts to claim to be a real person without proving it.
November 26, 2025 at 10:05 PM
I have nothing against anonymity but they should ban fake anonymity or pretending to be someone else. There's nothing wrong with Liam Nissan or Tweet of God because you know they're fake. Don't allow accounts to claim to be a real person without proving it.