Brian L. Frye
@brianlfrye.bsky.social
Dogecoin Professor of Law & Grifting. Securities artist & conceptual lawyer. Legal scholarship's #1 plagiarism apologist. Maybell Romero’s +1. https://linktr.ee/brianlfrye
If you can be replaced by an AI model, you were never an artist or writer.
November 26, 2025 at 7:47 PM
If you can be replaced by an AI model, you were never an artist or writer.
Everything is faux. 🤗
November 23, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Everything is faux. 🤗
The pleasure was all mine!
November 21, 2025 at 6:30 AM
The pleasure was all mine!
If only there were a charitable organization that represented law schools that could create a free service that did exactly the same thing.
November 18, 2025 at 4:40 PM
If only there were a charitable organization that represented law schools that could create a free service that did exactly the same thing.
The license text could be protected by copyright, to the extent it includes “original” expressive elements, but there might also be merger issues if there’s only a limited number of ways of expressing the idea.
November 18, 2025 at 3:44 PM
The license text could be protected by copyright, to the extent it includes “original” expressive elements, but there might also be merger issues if there’s only a limited number of ways of expressing the idea.
There's a brand-new essay by Frank Fagen, haven't had a chance to read it yet, but it sounds pretty interesting. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
The Coming Law Review Shortage
Today, law reviews sit near equilibrium: roughly 5,000 annual submissions for about 5,600 slots. Tomorrow, large language models are likely to drive output towa
papers.ssrn.com
November 18, 2025 at 4:29 AM
There's a brand-new essay by Frank Fagen, haven't had a chance to read it yet, but it sounds pretty interesting. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Douglas seems more like a zombie killer to me.
November 18, 2025 at 3:02 AM
Douglas seems more like a zombie killer to me.
Probably not, I like this one too much.
November 17, 2025 at 5:58 AM
Probably not, I like this one too much.
Not sure, I don’t think so.
November 17, 2025 at 5:58 AM
Not sure, I don’t think so.
Strikes me as about the best case for it?
November 15, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Strikes me as about the best case for it?
Laches, maybe? I don’t see how you can let/encourage millions of people take the same photo & then enforce only against the people you dislike.
November 15, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Laches, maybe? I don’t see how you can let/encourage millions of people take the same photo & then enforce only against the people you dislike.
I’m not entirely sure they’ve copied an original element created by Kapoor. Also seems like there’s an implied license for anyone to photograph this work. Maybe not to use it commercially under Warhol?
November 15, 2025 at 4:13 PM
I’m not entirely sure they’ve copied an original element created by Kapoor. Also seems like there’s an implied license for anyone to photograph this work. Maybe not to use it commercially under Warhol?
Doing my best to kiss up to my new boss.
November 11, 2025 at 3:49 AM
Doing my best to kiss up to my new boss.
I get to stick with copyright, which is all federal. 🙏
November 11, 2025 at 3:49 AM
I get to stick with copyright, which is all federal. 🙏