Only censoring to prevent b//o/ts as seems like there’s been an uptick in that.

Because I don't think people who I don't like should be sexually harassed either! No one deserves to be. Even the most reprehensible person (which I don't think Viv is I just don't like the handling of some topics in her work) doesn't.

I apologize if I offended you from the way this was phrased.

I hate Viv's works and what I know of her, but a sex scene not being that explicit isn't a reason to say parasocial comments on her sex life. Love not being on Twitter anymore.

I just think if a product is removed from shelves, the owners of said product deserve to hear why in the event of appealing to them or defending their case. Just linking a vague list does not help at all.

Basically it’s Rule of Rose 2 electric boogaloo of having shit made up via word of mouth and trying to justify banning. Only this all started cause the developers never got an actual explanation for why their game is banned.

Am I gonna play it? Definitely not due to the subject matters being too much for me.

Do I think it needs to be banned? Hell no. It’s only getting this pushback because of people lying about what’s in the final game without even playing it.