The article argues that models being multimodal "undermines Harcourt’s objection that LLMs aren’t sufficiently rooted in the physical world." NO IT FUCKING DOESN'T. A video turned into tokens is still tokens. So tired of this nonsense.

excuse me don't you mean binch?

Now, be fair. These figures only go up to August, but OpenAI did not upload that dubious paper to arXiv falsely claiming that they could fix the issue until September. We have to give them a chance!

interested in none / limits other

try and work that one out

If one side is interested in many, and the other side is interested in one, then where is interested in none?

that's why I'm here

Better safe than sorry, don't even mention that it's art

oh I see, it's okay for him to be sexist if he lampshades it. I think I understand

NOW I AM GOING TO LIE DOWN

GOODNIGHT

If they were a corporate AI slop machine that would, also, be bad,

but they aren't

they are a different kind of bad.

They are very obviously not a corporate AI slop machine. They are something else, and that something else is bad. If you waste time lying about them being a corporate AI slop machine, nobody hears about why the something else is bad.

You might think, what does it matter, so long as people don't use it?

The problem with using a weak and false argument against them is that they can debunk it and then they win.

diVine is disgusting, because it is playing on nostalgia for Vine, but Vine would actually ban Nazis.

"This is going to turn into a site full of Nazis" would be a pretty weird thing to say about a group I am trying to defend??? Like, I am literally calling them ideologically evil?? What kind of a defence is that?

It's not the same.

OpenAI took advantage of their non-profit status by building a model that they said was for research that they then turned into a product.