Bouchard
@boucharda.bsky.social
Newsom has peddled transphobic garbage and pandered to Nazi podcasters. He's also vetoed a ton of bills that would have reduced costs for Californians or reduced the suffering of the unhoused because he was afraid they'd eat into the profits of corporations.
February 5, 2026 at 8:11 PM
Newsom has peddled transphobic garbage and pandered to Nazi podcasters. He's also vetoed a ton of bills that would have reduced costs for Californians or reduced the suffering of the unhoused because he was afraid they'd eat into the profits of corporations.
To intimidate other observers into stopping.
February 4, 2026 at 3:19 PM
To intimidate other observers into stopping.
It wasn't a mistake. It was premeditated murder.
January 29, 2026 at 8:18 PM
It wasn't a mistake. It was premeditated murder.
I mean, he stole thousands of sensitive and even classified documents just so he could show them off to sycophants at Mar-a-Lago.
January 20, 2026 at 7:01 PM
I mean, he stole thousands of sensitive and even classified documents just so he could show them off to sycophants at Mar-a-Lago.
They'll have the right to use and share your data baked into the TOS, thus forcing you to give up your right to privacy.
January 20, 2026 at 5:54 PM
They'll have the right to use and share your data baked into the TOS, thus forcing you to give up your right to privacy.
Every cabinet member was specifically chosen for being the worst possible choice for that position.
January 20, 2026 at 5:40 PM
Every cabinet member was specifically chosen for being the worst possible choice for that position.
Unfortunately, ICE agents will be able to continue "working" while the people who provide actual immigration services will be furloughed.
January 20, 2026 at 5:33 PM
Unfortunately, ICE agents will be able to continue "working" while the people who provide actual immigration services will be furloughed.
This dichotomy reminds of the "what about the mercury" argument against CFLs back in the day. cdk007 did a video where he showed that even if you chucked the CFL in the trash at EOL, you still ended up with less mercury pollution because of the amount of coal used to generate electricity.
January 20, 2026 at 5:30 PM
This dichotomy reminds of the "what about the mercury" argument against CFLs back in the day. cdk007 did a video where he showed that even if you chucked the CFL in the trash at EOL, you still ended up with less mercury pollution because of the amount of coal used to generate electricity.
They don't serve their _stated_ purposes. This has always been their purpose.
January 20, 2026 at 5:12 PM
They don't serve their _stated_ purposes. This has always been their purpose.
He's the pigeon in the "playing chess with a pigeon" adage.
January 14, 2026 at 1:49 PM
He's the pigeon in the "playing chess with a pigeon" adage.
They didn't get paid during the shutdown, it was back pay. Military members are also entitled to back pay, but during the last shutdown Trump illegally used funds appropriated for other purposes to send them checks.
January 13, 2026 at 1:51 PM
They didn't get paid during the shutdown, it was back pay. Military members are also entitled to back pay, but during the last shutdown Trump illegally used funds appropriated for other purposes to send them checks.
It's from British Columbia.
January 11, 2026 at 9:44 PM
It's from British Columbia.
The company's website says all their caviar comes from their aquafarms in British Columbia.
January 11, 2026 at 9:36 PM
The company's website says all their caviar comes from their aquafarms in British Columbia.
I guarantee you that this guy joined the fake outrage machine that got people fired and/or arrested for quoting Charlie Kirk after he was shot.
January 11, 2026 at 1:03 AM
I guarantee you that this guy joined the fake outrage machine that got people fired and/or arrested for quoting Charlie Kirk after he was shot.
Harris's advisors made him tone it down.
January 6, 2026 at 6:34 PM
Harris's advisors made him tone it down.
No, that's not the test put in place by SCOTUS. The requirement they added was that Congress passes a law prohibiting a specific insurrectionist from running for office. Their standard would require such a law even if Merrick Garland had had the backbone to prosecute Trump.
December 15, 2025 at 11:08 PM
No, that's not the test put in place by SCOTUS. The requirement they added was that Congress passes a law prohibiting a specific insurrectionist from running for office. Their standard would require such a law even if Merrick Garland had had the backbone to prosecute Trump.
The Constitution says nothing about being found guilty in a court of law.
December 15, 2025 at 8:54 PM
The Constitution says nothing about being found guilty in a court of law.
And if he really doesn't have time for it, he should have someone whose job it is to monitor Trump's insane ramblings and warn him of anything especially egregious that he may be asked about.
December 15, 2025 at 7:38 PM
And if he really doesn't have time for it, he should have someone whose job it is to monitor Trump's insane ramblings and warn him of anything especially egregious that he may be asked about.
Every time Trump insults or accuses someone, he's projecting.
December 10, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Every time Trump insults or accuses someone, he's projecting.