Bob Kopp
bobkopp.net
Bob Kopp
@bobkopp.net
#Climate & sea level science + policy. Rutgers University. All views my own. www.bobkopp.net
@mikiesherrill.bsky.social was elected on a platform aggressively critical of PJM
November 27, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Well, the president’s budget request does get rid of the environmental half of Biological & Environmental Research. So I’m not quite as optimistic …
November 26, 2025 at 1:45 PM
Reposted by Bob Kopp
yes and partially there already www.congress.gov/crs-product/....
www.congress.gov
November 26, 2025 at 1:41 PM
It certainly has the authority to set environmental performance standards for Genesis Mission procurement.
November 26, 2025 at 12:58 PM
As an aside, not that anybody cares right now, I think there’s a fairly colorable argument that DOE has the statutory authority to set energy efficiency standards for data center.
November 26, 2025 at 12:55 PM
3. It pains me to see DOE launch a major scientific initiative without a whisper of Earth & environmental research

4. If you wanted to hide public bail outs of AI firms, this could be a place to do so
November 26, 2025 at 12:39 PM
Reposted by Bob Kopp
AI will be trained on federal datasets that are the accumulation of decades of world-class research. The admin has also decimated that research infrastructure.
November 25, 2025 at 2:28 AM
Not sure I would assign a prior probability of zero to the existence of Noachian life, so don’t see how you can rule that out based on the absence of evidence.

But I was a Joe Kirschvink PhD student
www.uv.es
November 26, 2025 at 1:30 AM
We probably can’t rule out Noachian Martian bacteria hitching a ride to Hadean Earth, either.

But I think we can assume from the rest of the survey’s context that respondents are interpreting aliens as technological beings, not prokaryotes…
November 26, 2025 at 1:17 AM
Also, they do ask both about visits “in recent years” and “ever”, and there are only 4% who shift more positive if allowed the entirety of geologic time. (I would have expected some movement from “definitely not” to “probably not”, but both decline)
November 26, 2025 at 1:07 AM
Agreed. But I was struck by the how small the proportion of people thinking aliens probably exist somewhere in the universe but have never visited Earth are, since that seems to me by far the most likely answer.
November 26, 2025 at 1:07 AM
Probably correct (and yes, I spent many years teaching undergrads the Drake equation in my course on “how to build and maintain a habitable planet”) — but if you ask unconditionally “do aliens exist?”, the universe is awfully big.
November 26, 2025 at 12:57 AM
Personally, I think it is unlikely we are the only technological species ever to have existed in any part of the universe over the last 13 billion years
November 26, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Does the difference between Democrats and Republicans reflect a difference between Carl Sagan fans and religious Christians committed to the idea of a single creation?
November 26, 2025 at 12:42 AM
Do the 47% think aliens have visited Earth in the history of human civilization, or just at some point in the last 4.6 billion years?
November 26, 2025 at 12:42 AM
Yeah, I just wonder whether they drop the whole “alternative rationale” built upon the debunked and unfinalized DOE report
November 23, 2025 at 12:37 AM