Balázs Knakker
@bknakker.bsky.social
doing cognitive neuroscience, interested in stats and computational methods.
You also seem to imply, but definitely 🐇 AND 💤. For me: Rr for exploring literature via citation graphs, Zz mostly for citation. I'm trying to use Zz for storing and keeping track of papers but I'm not completely satisfied. I'd put Obsidian in the stack as well, as a third leg.
June 16, 2025 at 4:37 PM
You also seem to imply, but definitely 🐇 AND 💤. For me: Rr for exploring literature via citation graphs, Zz mostly for citation. I'm trying to use Zz for storing and keeping track of papers but I'm not completely satisfied. I'd put Obsidian in the stack as well, as a third leg.
Then you probably do :) I very often need to work with quite small n.
October 12, 2023 at 9:31 PM
Then you probably do :) I very often need to work with quite small n.
No, I mean more observations (eg. subjects an/or trials).
October 12, 2023 at 9:20 PM
No, I mean more observations (eg. subjects an/or trials).
If you treat it as category, you probably need more data. As a cont. factor eg. it can be just one linear term, for cat., it's ncats-1 terms. If you add it to rfx n of parameters further explodes. This is my hunch of what could be happening, but ofc depends on the particular error you get :)
October 12, 2023 at 6:09 PM
If you treat it as category, you probably need more data. As a cont. factor eg. it can be just one linear term, for cat., it's ncats-1 terms. If you add it to rfx n of parameters further explodes. This is my hunch of what could be happening, but ofc depends on the particular error you get :)