🔹 Explored fewer, more focused combinations
🔹 Showed lower entropy (less random search)
🔹 Used semantic generalization to build on prior success 🔹 Combined semantically dissimilar items to innovate
🔹 Explored fewer, more focused combinations
🔹 Showed lower entropy (less random search)
🔹 Used semantic generalization to build on prior success 🔹 Combined semantically dissimilar items to innovate
When items had meaning (semantic condition), people innovated far more—especially with social learning. Without meaning (non-semantic condition)? Performance was no better than random "bots".
When items had meaning (semantic condition), people innovated far more—especially with social learning. Without meaning (non-semantic condition)? Performance was no better than random "bots".
Agents that with both semantic knowledge and social learning dominate over time, exploring efficiently—not randomly. Crucially, semantic knowledge and social learning act in synergy.
Agents that with both semantic knowledge and social learning dominate over time, exploring efficiently—not randomly. Crucially, semantic knowledge and social learning act in synergy.
Our new preprint, led by
@anilyaman.bsky.social & @ts-brain.bsky.social
shows that semantic knowledge guides innovation and drives cultural evolution. 🧠📘 arxiv.org/abs/2510.12837
Our new preprint, led by
@anilyaman.bsky.social & @ts-brain.bsky.social
shows that semantic knowledge guides innovation and drives cultural evolution. 🧠📘 arxiv.org/abs/2510.12837
🔹 Explored fewer, more focused combinations
🔹 Showed lower entropy (less random search)
🔹 Used semantic generalization to build on prior success
🔹 Combined semantically dissimilar items to innovate
🔹 Explored fewer, more focused combinations
🔹 Showed lower entropy (less random search)
🔹 Used semantic generalization to build on prior success
🔹 Combined semantically dissimilar items to innovate
When items had meaning (semantic condition), people innovated far more—especially with social learning.
Without meaning (non-semantic condition)? Performance was no better than random "bots".
When items had meaning (semantic condition), people innovated far more—especially with social learning.
Without meaning (non-semantic condition)? Performance was no better than random "bots".
Agents that with both semantic knowledge and social learning dominate over time, exploring efficiently—not randomly.
Crucially, semantic knowledge and social learning act in synergy.
Agents that with both semantic knowledge and social learning dominate over time, exploring efficiently—not randomly.
Crucially, semantic knowledge and social learning act in synergy.
Through success, they build semantic knowledge. structured associations between items and functions, and pass this knowledge to their offspring.
Through success, they build semantic knowledge. structured associations between items and functions, and pass this knowledge to their offspring.
(led by Ida Selbing) find that extinction learning does not reduce the maladaptive transfer of social threat learning to decision-making. osf.io/gyzm3/
(led by Ida Selbing) find that extinction learning does not reduce the maladaptive transfer of social threat learning to decision-making. osf.io/gyzm3/