Besk0n3™
@beskone.com
Fast production storage nerd. Former wannabe DnB DJ, Fuzz Guitar enthusiast & Motorsports fanatic. Mostly Shitposting. My cats are Ferris and Leeoo.
He/Him/That Fucking Guy
He/Him/That Fucking Guy
Everyone needs to get over the single issue Gaza voters. Could they have made a difference? Maybe? Would it have been enough to win? Probably not.
Gaza voters didn't cost her the election.
Be mad at the right people. (the GOP) and not at the loads of low info voters that swung to trump.
Gaza voters didn't cost her the election.
Be mad at the right people. (the GOP) and not at the loads of low info voters that swung to trump.
January 27, 2026 at 3:20 PM
Everyone needs to get over the single issue Gaza voters. Could they have made a difference? Maybe? Would it have been enough to win? Probably not.
Gaza voters didn't cost her the election.
Be mad at the right people. (the GOP) and not at the loads of low info voters that swung to trump.
Gaza voters didn't cost her the election.
Be mad at the right people. (the GOP) and not at the loads of low info voters that swung to trump.
So, yes. Let's unpack that last statement.
1. We have a broken immigration system.
2. If you deport people legally and with due process, I got no problem with that. (that's not what's happening)
3. #2 doesn't mean I don't want to fix #1 to decrease #2.
Why is that so wild to you?
1. We have a broken immigration system.
2. If you deport people legally and with due process, I got no problem with that. (that's not what's happening)
3. #2 doesn't mean I don't want to fix #1 to decrease #2.
Why is that so wild to you?
January 26, 2026 at 3:37 PM
So, yes. Let's unpack that last statement.
1. We have a broken immigration system.
2. If you deport people legally and with due process, I got no problem with that. (that's not what's happening)
3. #2 doesn't mean I don't want to fix #1 to decrease #2.
Why is that so wild to you?
1. We have a broken immigration system.
2. If you deport people legally and with due process, I got no problem with that. (that's not what's happening)
3. #2 doesn't mean I don't want to fix #1 to decrease #2.
Why is that so wild to you?
Sure sure, no one buying wb isn’t a likely scenario. Also chill with the all caps.
January 25, 2026 at 12:23 AM
Sure sure, no one buying wb isn’t a likely scenario. Also chill with the all caps.
lol, if it doesn’t go through trups toadies at paramount will buy it and that would be 1000% worse.
January 25, 2026 at 12:07 AM
lol, if it doesn’t go through trups toadies at paramount will buy it and that would be 1000% worse.
Ya, this is the big problem, This is what Steven miller wants.
As soon as an ICE agent get's killed, they'll try and go full military gestapo and declare martial law.
Walz activating the Guard would be a good step in maintaining some order to prevent this.
As soon as an ICE agent get's killed, they'll try and go full military gestapo and declare martial law.
Walz activating the Guard would be a good step in maintaining some order to prevent this.
January 24, 2026 at 5:30 PM
Ya, this is the big problem, This is what Steven miller wants.
As soon as an ICE agent get's killed, they'll try and go full military gestapo and declare martial law.
Walz activating the Guard would be a good step in maintaining some order to prevent this.
As soon as an ICE agent get's killed, they'll try and go full military gestapo and declare martial law.
Walz activating the Guard would be a good step in maintaining some order to prevent this.
Gaslighting ass fucks. GTFO with this bullshit.
January 23, 2026 at 8:15 PM
Gaslighting ass fucks. GTFO with this bullshit.
I'm a typical straight ticket Dem voter.
But, I think you change systems from within - you have to demand better Dems, and pull the party in the direction you want to see.
There's not a viable way to move the scales politically in this country otherwise. It's weird to see Dems fight against that.
But, I think you change systems from within - you have to demand better Dems, and pull the party in the direction you want to see.
There's not a viable way to move the scales politically in this country otherwise. It's weird to see Dems fight against that.
January 23, 2026 at 4:35 PM
I'm a typical straight ticket Dem voter.
But, I think you change systems from within - you have to demand better Dems, and pull the party in the direction you want to see.
There's not a viable way to move the scales politically in this country otherwise. It's weird to see Dems fight against that.
But, I think you change systems from within - you have to demand better Dems, and pull the party in the direction you want to see.
There's not a viable way to move the scales politically in this country otherwise. It's weird to see Dems fight against that.
And they're showing it by doing what?
January 23, 2026 at 4:29 PM
And they're showing it by doing what?
LOL, I guess you'd be surprised. I'm not only a bleeding heart liberal, but I think I've transitioned into full blooded Democratic Socialist.
You can read my post history I guess and find out for yourself if you wanted.
You can read my post history I guess and find out for yourself if you wanted.
January 23, 2026 at 4:28 PM
LOL, I guess you'd be surprised. I'm not only a bleeding heart liberal, but I think I've transitioned into full blooded Democratic Socialist.
You can read my post history I guess and find out for yourself if you wanted.
You can read my post history I guess and find out for yourself if you wanted.
WUT? Leading by not taking any visible action?
I'm a lifelong straight ticket kinda Democrat.
The current leadership SUCKS ASS. Beholden to donors, scared of the mythical "moderate voter" that doesn't exist, weak, ineffective, and spineless.
You may not want it, but I demand better from my party.
I'm a lifelong straight ticket kinda Democrat.
The current leadership SUCKS ASS. Beholden to donors, scared of the mythical "moderate voter" that doesn't exist, weak, ineffective, and spineless.
You may not want it, but I demand better from my party.
January 23, 2026 at 4:23 PM
WUT? Leading by not taking any visible action?
I'm a lifelong straight ticket kinda Democrat.
The current leadership SUCKS ASS. Beholden to donors, scared of the mythical "moderate voter" that doesn't exist, weak, ineffective, and spineless.
You may not want it, but I demand better from my party.
I'm a lifelong straight ticket kinda Democrat.
The current leadership SUCKS ASS. Beholden to donors, scared of the mythical "moderate voter" that doesn't exist, weak, ineffective, and spineless.
You may not want it, but I demand better from my party.
And still missing the point.
It's NOT ABOUT THE VOTE FAILING.
It's about Leadership showing NO INTEREST in LEADING.
It's NOT ABOUT THE VOTE FAILING.
It's about Leadership showing NO INTEREST in LEADING.
January 23, 2026 at 4:16 PM
And still missing the point.
It's NOT ABOUT THE VOTE FAILING.
It's about Leadership showing NO INTEREST in LEADING.
It's NOT ABOUT THE VOTE FAILING.
It's about Leadership showing NO INTEREST in LEADING.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I didn't post that article to make a point about Dem leadership being so great on this issue. But it's cool, I'll just let you have your moment or whatever this is.
January 23, 2026 at 4:15 PM
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I didn't post that article to make a point about Dem leadership being so great on this issue. But it's cool, I'll just let you have your moment or whatever this is.
THIS. THIS IS ALL PEOPLE ARE ASKING FOR.
Maybe he can't get all the Dems on board, but it shows LEADERSHIP is behind the issue, which is important.
Maybe he can't get all the Dems on board, but it shows LEADERSHIP is behind the issue, which is important.
January 23, 2026 at 4:12 PM
THIS. THIS IS ALL PEOPLE ARE ASKING FOR.
Maybe he can't get all the Dems on board, but it shows LEADERSHIP is behind the issue, which is important.
Maybe he can't get all the Dems on board, but it shows LEADERSHIP is behind the issue, which is important.
From the fucking article you linked - the HEADLINE even:
"House Narrowly Passes ICE Funding Bill With Democratic Support After Jeffries Declined To Whip Against It"
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"House Narrowly Passes ICE Funding Bill With Democratic Support After Jeffries Declined To Whip Against It"
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
January 23, 2026 at 4:11 PM
From the fucking article you linked - the HEADLINE even:
"House Narrowly Passes ICE Funding Bill With Democratic Support After Jeffries Declined To Whip Against It"
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"House Narrowly Passes ICE Funding Bill With Democratic Support After Jeffries Declined To Whip Against It"
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It's less about the ones that voted yes. The Dem party is a huge tent and it's often hard to have 100% consensus for a load of reasons.
The issue is the leadership, not... you know... LEADING.
Not even showing a desire to whip the vote show's how out of touch they are.
The issue is the leadership, not... you know... LEADING.
Not even showing a desire to whip the vote show's how out of touch they are.
January 23, 2026 at 4:10 PM
It's less about the ones that voted yes. The Dem party is a huge tent and it's often hard to have 100% consensus for a load of reasons.
The issue is the leadership, not... you know... LEADING.
Not even showing a desire to whip the vote show's how out of touch they are.
The issue is the leadership, not... you know... LEADING.
Not even showing a desire to whip the vote show's how out of touch they are.
The issue is Dem leadership not even bothering to whip a vote that could have shown said eadership *cared* at all about an issue that's HUGELY important to a lot of not only their base, but a ever growing segment of independents and even republicans.
It's a failure of leadership.
It's a failure of leadership.
January 23, 2026 at 4:08 PM
The issue is Dem leadership not even bothering to whip a vote that could have shown said eadership *cared* at all about an issue that's HUGELY important to a lot of not only their base, but a ever growing segment of independents and even republicans.
It's a failure of leadership.
It's a failure of leadership.
Look, I love to dunk on the hyper online ultra-leftists that hate everything the Dems do too, but *even* if they would have lost if every Dem voted no, the fact that any voted YES is the issue.
Especially when "Abolish ICE" is the moderate position for most people now.
Especially when "Abolish ICE" is the moderate position for most people now.
January 23, 2026 at 4:04 PM
Look, I love to dunk on the hyper online ultra-leftists that hate everything the Dems do too, but *even* if they would have lost if every Dem voted no, the fact that any voted YES is the issue.
Especially when "Abolish ICE" is the moderate position for most people now.
Especially when "Abolish ICE" is the moderate position for most people now.
wanna bet how much they did it with Grok?
January 22, 2026 at 7:10 PM
wanna bet how much they did it with Grok?
How else will we know if the Cookie Monster is infiltrating the Gibson dude?
January 22, 2026 at 3:37 PM
How else will we know if the Cookie Monster is infiltrating the Gibson dude?