Berning Atheist
@berningatheist.bsky.social
Atheist, Leftist, idealist. Owner of two cats and one dog. I despise both parties. One for hatred and authoritarianism, and the other for being a cheap knock off of the first that lies about opposing them.
I'm not looking for an echo chamber.
I'm not looking for an echo chamber.
Translation: "The lobbyists we employ to poll why we lost, determined it wasnt the lobbyists fault."
Also funny your excuse is "we are bleeding members".
I agree that is part of your problem. People are abandoning the hollow spineless party that stands for nothing at all.
Also funny your excuse is "we are bleeding members".
I agree that is part of your problem. People are abandoning the hollow spineless party that stands for nothing at all.
December 10, 2025 at 11:51 PM
Translation: "The lobbyists we employ to poll why we lost, determined it wasnt the lobbyists fault."
Also funny your excuse is "we are bleeding members".
I agree that is part of your problem. People are abandoning the hollow spineless party that stands for nothing at all.
Also funny your excuse is "we are bleeding members".
I agree that is part of your problem. People are abandoning the hollow spineless party that stands for nothing at all.
Id like some eggs, fresh milk, and some healthcare please......
December 10, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Id like some eggs, fresh milk, and some healthcare please......
The corporatists are the Democratic Party insiders that selected Kamala and removed many primaries.
"Smoke filled dark rooms" and all.
They cant give up the juicy lobbyist money so they chased the Liz Cheneys of the world.
The party has way more responsibility here.
"Smoke filled dark rooms" and all.
They cant give up the juicy lobbyist money so they chased the Liz Cheneys of the world.
The party has way more responsibility here.
December 10, 2025 at 10:08 PM
The corporatists are the Democratic Party insiders that selected Kamala and removed many primaries.
"Smoke filled dark rooms" and all.
They cant give up the juicy lobbyist money so they chased the Liz Cheneys of the world.
The party has way more responsibility here.
"Smoke filled dark rooms" and all.
They cant give up the juicy lobbyist money so they chased the Liz Cheneys of the world.
The party has way more responsibility here.
It wasnt bad enough for them to give up on their corporatism.
Maybe you should address why that is before you blame the voter base.
Remember. Kamala did NOT win a primary.
Maybe you should address why that is before you blame the voter base.
Remember. Kamala did NOT win a primary.
December 10, 2025 at 10:02 PM
It wasnt bad enough for them to give up on their corporatism.
Maybe you should address why that is before you blame the voter base.
Remember. Kamala did NOT win a primary.
Maybe you should address why that is before you blame the voter base.
Remember. Kamala did NOT win a primary.
Probably. Text lacks the sarcastic tone sometimes.
December 10, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Probably. Text lacks the sarcastic tone sometimes.
Because there is an option to not vote at all.
So long as the messaging is "They are bad, vote for us", there is no reason to believe the supposedly good side to do anything for us at all.
So long as the messaging is "They are bad, vote for us", there is no reason to believe the supposedly good side to do anything for us at all.
December 10, 2025 at 9:58 PM
Because there is an option to not vote at all.
So long as the messaging is "They are bad, vote for us", there is no reason to believe the supposedly good side to do anything for us at all.
So long as the messaging is "They are bad, vote for us", there is no reason to believe the supposedly good side to do anything for us at all.
If this is your "feel better about losing excuse", then you will lose your next election too.
Maybe dont ignore the screaming of the base, and you can have your win.
Maybe dont ignore the screaming of the base, and you can have your win.
December 10, 2025 at 6:55 PM
If this is your "feel better about losing excuse", then you will lose your next election too.
Maybe dont ignore the screaming of the base, and you can have your win.
Maybe dont ignore the screaming of the base, and you can have your win.
We call them Republicans.
Kamala wasnt going to win those votes, but she chased them.
Then she lost the people that WOULD vote for her, because she ignored supporting their needs.
Kamala wasnt going to win those votes, but she chased them.
Then she lost the people that WOULD vote for her, because she ignored supporting their needs.
December 10, 2025 at 6:53 PM
We call them Republicans.
Kamala wasnt going to win those votes, but she chased them.
Then she lost the people that WOULD vote for her, because she ignored supporting their needs.
Kamala wasnt going to win those votes, but she chased them.
Then she lost the people that WOULD vote for her, because she ignored supporting their needs.
What are you talking about? Hillary lost to Trump for the same damn reasons.
They ignored their base and thrust her down her throats.
Thats when we got a peek at their true beliefs as shown in court docs
"We can decide our candidates in smoke filled back rooms".
Their party name is an oxymoron
They ignored their base and thrust her down her throats.
Thats when we got a peek at their true beliefs as shown in court docs
"We can decide our candidates in smoke filled back rooms".
Their party name is an oxymoron
December 10, 2025 at 6:52 PM
What are you talking about? Hillary lost to Trump for the same damn reasons.
They ignored their base and thrust her down her throats.
Thats when we got a peek at their true beliefs as shown in court docs
"We can decide our candidates in smoke filled back rooms".
Their party name is an oxymoron
They ignored their base and thrust her down her throats.
Thats when we got a peek at their true beliefs as shown in court docs
"We can decide our candidates in smoke filled back rooms".
Their party name is an oxymoron