Ben Zaranko
benzaranko.bsky.social
Ben Zaranko
@benzaranko.bsky.social
Economist at the IFS
This isn't by any means exhaustive. Lots more detail in the full IFS response and analysis here, including presentations from my lovely colleagues:

ifs.org.uk/events/autum...
Autumn Budget 2025: IFS analysis | Institute for Fiscal Studies
At this online webinar IFS researchers present their initial response to Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Autumn Budget.
ifs.org.uk
November 27, 2025 at 12:15 PM
11) Pretending that an increase in National Insurance is not a breach of a manifesto promise not to increase National Insurance
November 27, 2025 at 12:15 PM
8) Half-baked property tax changes

9) Lack of ambition on tax reform more generally (if not now, when?) - especially on taxation of saving and investment

10) The insane amount of pre-Budget briefing and speculation
November 27, 2025 at 12:15 PM
I'm old enough to remember when this government was vociferously complaining about the unrealistically low spending plans it inherited from the last government... could argue they're now using the same playbook... Spending Review 2027 will be tough.
November 27, 2025 at 12:15 PM
A few areas where I'm more critical:

7) The spend now, pay later approach: extra spending is heavily front-loaded, tax rises are heavily back-loaded. The consolidation plan relies heavily on the government doing difficult things in an election year. I have some doubts.
November 27, 2025 at 12:15 PM
4) More transparency on special educational needs pressures (i.e. finally recognising they exist)

5) Maintaining capital investment plans even when money is tight

6) If the aim is to reduce child poverty, scrapping the two-child limit is a cost-efficient means of doing so
November 27, 2025 at 12:15 PM
My concern about this is that the OBR's spring forecast for fiscal aggregates will be available for all to see. Anyone can read off the spreadsheet. If government is off track by a sizeable margin, it's very likely to trigger policy speculation and/or demands for a response.
November 26, 2025 at 1:41 PM
This means a much smaller hit to the borrowing outlook than generally expected (including by us). Before accounting for the U-turns on welfare, she'd have been on track to meet her fiscal rules! Does make me wonder if/why manifesto-busting tax rises were ever under consideration.
November 26, 2025 at 12:40 PM
Maybe the IFS are the horrible sibling who dobs her in with her parents, painstakingly demonstrating that she has, in fact, taken the equivalent of a full bottle of vodka, and that her promises to pay it back through 2030-31 pocket money don't amount to much
November 21, 2025 at 2:20 PM
November 19, 2025 at 10:08 AM
It's less about people, I guess, and more about the framework/processes/norms/equilibrium
November 14, 2025 at 4:08 PM