Ben J Woodcroft
benjwoodcroft.bsky.social
Ben J Woodcroft
@benjwoodcroft.bsky.social
Yet another microbial bioinformatician, group leader, dad
github.com/wwood https://research.qut.edu.au/cmr/team/ben-woodcroft/
indeed. It actually just uses the Dark2 palette plus white at the moment. github.com/wwood/single... - should be easy enough to limit the number of colours, but expanding beyond that is hard. What is your use-case here?
singlem/singlem/appraisal_result.py at d416d391aea9c769d050426ea793121d7deaedb2 · wwood/singlem
Novelty-inclusive microbial (and now dsDNA phage) community profiling of shotgun metagenomes - wwood/singlem
github.com
November 25, 2025 at 12:22 AM
@aroneys.bsky.social is this relatively trivial you think? @alexjaf.bsky.social is it simply the number to colour?
November 24, 2025 at 8:14 AM
November 17, 2025 at 4:49 AM
In the meantime, we've been collecting a list of these at tinyurl.com/mag-collecti.... Feel free to add more you find.

See also GlobDB from @daanspeth.bsky.social which incorporates some of these into a new MAG collection arxiv.org/abs/2506.11896
Public MAG datasets not available at NCBI or ENA
Some metagenome assembled genome (MAG) datasets are not available in the standard locations (NCBI / ENA / etc) for a variety of reasons. Here you can contribute new ones you come across. To be recorde...
tinyurl.com
October 24, 2025 at 8:41 AM
Yes normal behaviour. See wwood.github.io/singlem/FAQ for the formula - most windows are 60bp, and so if your reads are uniform length you get that.

But you are looking at the OTU table there, perhaps you want the taxonomic profile output (which is a more final output)?
FAQ
Documentation for SingleM
wwood.github.io
July 23, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Trimmed reads are bad news when they become short, but if they remain 100bp+ then you should be fine I reckon.
2/2
July 23, 2025 at 5:35 AM
Thanks - strange that your Lyrebird experience wasn't good. Please report errors (what did you you?) at github.com/wwood/single... or just via email. We test installation inclusive of DB download at github.com/wwood/single...

But a new version of the lyrebird DB incoming btw.
1/2
wwood/singlem
Novelty-inclusive microbial (and now dsDNA phage) community profiling of shotgun metagenomes - wwood/singlem
github.com
July 23, 2025 at 5:35 AM
Thanks for kind words. By UCEs you mean e.g. 16S? It actually does this already, and tests pass. But it isn't the most efficient and code is a bit crusty and db is out of date, since it doesn't get used much. See wwood.github.io/singlem/FAQ
FAQ
Documentation for SingleM
wwood.github.io
July 19, 2025 at 10:51 AM
This is great @titus.idyll.org (though to be picky it's SingleM or singlem, not singleM). We wrote a few parsers for other formats at github.com/wwood/single... - it'd be nice if not everyone needed to reinvent (and use standard names for things like coverage inclusive vs exclusive of children).
singlem-benchmarking/bin at main · wwood/singlem-benchmarking
Contribute to wwood/singlem-benchmarking development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
July 18, 2025 at 11:39 PM
I wonder if AI could do a good job of that integration. I'd love to learn some Haskell actually, just need to find the time..
July 18, 2025 at 11:33 PM
There is also a branch that takes nanopore reads as input, which works reasonably well. We are putting some final code touches on it, but maybe helpful - github.com/wwood/single...
Nanopore by thepatientwait · Pull Request #208 · wwood/singlem
Working Nanopore build. Important changes: DIAMOND prefilter Uses --range-culling + related args for DIAMOND. These results are now streamed to help memory. Sequences are indexed using gene names ...
github.com
July 18, 2025 at 1:07 AM
Good good, or could be better?
July 17, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Good q. Imagine that new Chem nanopore should be fine. You can check by running the supplemented package on your genomes and making sure there is the expected number of markers detected. Should be in line with mag completeness.
July 17, 2025 at 11:22 PM
cheers Daan - here's a thread explaining some of the deets bsky.app/profile/benj...
Out in @natbiotech.nature.com: Metagenome taxonomy profilers usually ignore unknown species. SingleM is an accurate profiler which doesn't, even detecting phyla with no MAGs. Profiles of 700,000 metagenomes at sandpiper.qut.edu.au. A 🧵
July 16, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Thanks for spreading the word @jcamthrash.bsky.social - there's a explanatory thread at bsky.app/profile/benj...
Out in @natbiotech.nature.com: Metagenome taxonomy profilers usually ignore unknown species. SingleM is an accurate profiler which doesn't, even detecting phyla with no MAGs. Profiles of 700,000 metagenomes at sandpiper.qut.edu.au. A 🧵
July 16, 2025 at 10:05 PM
Thanks for considering it for publication. There's a explanation thread at bsky.app/profile/benj...
Out in @natbiotech.nature.com: Metagenome taxonomy profilers usually ignore unknown species. SingleM is an accurate profiler which doesn't, even detecting phyla with no MAGs. Profiles of 700,000 metagenomes at sandpiper.qut.edu.au. A 🧵
July 16, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Much appreciated @bcoltman.bsky.social
July 16, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Thanks also to the reviewers including Alice McHardy - very fair and helpful we thought.
July 16, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Many many to thank, particularly
@aroneys.bsky.social @rossenzhao.bsky.social Mitchell Cunningham, Linda Blackall, Gene Tyson, @cmrqut.bsky.social and dozens of people who have helped with the software, ms, and everyone who tolerated my enthusiasm.
July 16, 2025 at 9:59 PM