Bartosz Bartkowski
banner
bartoszbartk.com
Bartosz Bartkowski
@bartoszbartk.com
Environmental economist | land use🚜🌱 / soils🪱 / biodiversity🪲 | behaviour & policy | social–ecological modelling | ast prof at @ufz.de & @unihalle.bsky.social | tea addict🫖 | jazz afficionado🎷 | born at 352 ppm | posts in 🇩🇪 🇬🇧 🇵🇱
https://bartoszbartk.com
Exactly my thinking
November 25, 2025 at 7:04 PM
...understanding of "novelty", therefore actually "littering" the literature with new tiny niches without really increasing our understanding.
November 25, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Congrats!
November 25, 2025 at 1:26 PM
I know. It's one of the (many) social norms in Germany that I am pretty sceptical of😉
November 25, 2025 at 7:15 AM
But why wine (alcoholic or not)?😭

Seriously: I think beyond alcohol specifically, an underlying problem is the urge to gift something to someone you don't really know – so you have no idea whether the gift, no matter how generic, fits. In such situations, I'd say no gift is preferrable.
November 25, 2025 at 6:50 AM
Me too. Makes me feel less bad when I don't give people anything😉
November 24, 2025 at 3:05 PM
I did, not so long ago, despite giving way fewer presentation that you😉 Small n in either case, I guess.
November 24, 2025 at 3:03 PM
If it weren't, I wouldn't have sent it out😉
November 24, 2025 at 3:02 PM
This German „Anstoßen“ tradition is a whole another issue (for me at least). Short version: I hate it😉
November 24, 2025 at 3:02 PM
At the same time, I'm too polite (or shy?) to outright reject such gifts or even say that they are of no use.
November 24, 2025 at 1:16 PM
I've never drunken alcohol (unless having a trial sip counts), so I'm fine with people being surprised/asking questions, because I know it's unusual. But I'm annoyed by people giving me wine or even chocolates with alcohol without considering that this could be a problem.
November 24, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Yeah, there's frustration on both sides...
November 24, 2025 at 11:51 AM
Everyone who publishes does, implicitly
November 24, 2025 at 11:50 AM
I totally agree with the point about exploitation. What I wanted to say is that to me, it's not really about "not getting paid". It's about publishers being essentially free riders on multiple public goods provided by/paid by academics and their funders.
November 24, 2025 at 10:46 AM
Which is why I am trying to (also) target junior people with my invitations. And declines are the smaller problem – I'm particularly annoyed at the non-responses.
November 24, 2025 at 8:52 AM
I have a problem with that "you don't get paid" bit. I consider it part of my (paid) academic job.

Also, I am not sure the publishers, who are the target of the "strike", are really hurt by it. To me it seems that it is hurting fellow researchers (especially junior ones) much more.
November 24, 2025 at 8:51 AM
I see the point in publishers making money off of us in a sense. But at the same time, I consider reviewing part of my job🤷🏻‍♂️
November 24, 2025 at 8:03 AM
But they are authors as well, complaining that their own submissions take so long… It's ultimately about indirect reciprocity.
November 24, 2025 at 7:08 AM