Anders Johansen 🪨🌍🇺🇦
banner
astroandersj.bsky.social
Anders Johansen 🪨🌍🇺🇦
@astroandersj.bsky.social
Theoretical astrophysicist, with expertise in planet formation. Head of Planet Formation Group at University of Copenhagen / Lund University. Opinions my own.

https://sites.google.com/view/planet-formation-group/group-members
'@bot.astronomy.blue signup'
February 25, 2025 at 6:13 PM
No. How do I do that?
February 25, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Comments and questions welcome.

arxiv.org/abs/2502.10186
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10186
t.co
February 25, 2025 at 3:24 PM
So the radius gap may be primordial and photoevaporation, in our view, plays mainly a role of actually filling in the gap region with planets completely or partially stripped of their gas envelope.
February 25, 2025 at 3:24 PM
This gives these nice 'crocodile' plots where the radius gap is clearly visible out to 0.5 astronomical units (AU) or so.
February 25, 2025 at 3:24 PM
In our paper we explore instead whether the gap is primordial, so that planets below the gap never accreted gas while planets above the gap did. Gas accretion is triggered in our model when the planets reach pebble isolation mass; the cooling then allows H2/He to be accreted.
February 25, 2025 at 3:24 PM
The most accepted explanation for this gap is that planets above the gap accreted a thick atmosphere of H2/He from the protoplanetary disc while those below lost this atmosphere by XUV irradiation from the star (these are close-in planets in much warmer orbits than Earth).
February 25, 2025 at 3:24 PM
The radius valley describes the lack of planets with radii around 1.5-2 times Earth's radius. Here a famous plot of the radius gap from Fulton et al. (2017).
February 25, 2025 at 3:24 PM
That brings back good memories of my postdoc years in Leiden. Thanks 🙏!
December 12, 2024 at 1:29 PM