Dan Hirschman
@asociologist.bsky.social
Sociologist @Cornell. Currently interested in the history of inequality statistics, and the role of economic expertise in climate policy. “Venceréis, pero no convenceréis.”
Such a great piece. Been thinking about it a ton as we watch American higher ed grapple with Trump Admin demands…
November 28, 2025 at 6:11 PM
Such a great piece. Been thinking about it a ton as we watch American higher ed grapple with Trump Admin demands…
Reposted by Dan Hirschman
This includes the values we want to support, the work we are able to do, and our technical requirements. We hope this policy will be ready to implement when the 90-day pause on AI-related papers ends. If you have expertise or suggestions for us in this work, we would appreciate hearing from you.
/6
/6
November 27, 2025 at 2:54 PM
This includes the values we want to support, the work we are able to do, and our technical requirements. We hope this policy will be ready to implement when the 90-day pause on AI-related papers ends. If you have expertise or suggestions for us in this work, we would appreciate hearing from you.
/6
/6
Reposted by Dan Hirschman
2. We are developing a policy for AI-related work. We need a formal policy on AI-generated and LLM-assisted content. We have formed a committee of volunteers from our social science and library science networks to gather existing policies and decide what to do.
/5
/5
November 27, 2025 at 2:54 PM
2. We are developing a policy for AI-related work. We need a formal policy on AI-generated and LLM-assisted content. We have formed a committee of volunteers from our social science and library science networks to gather existing policies and decide what to do.
/5
/5
Reposted by Dan Hirschman
And we will make exceptions for empirical social science research about AI in society – e.g., a study on how AI use affects workers in an organization – on a case-by-case basis. If your paper on an AI topic is rejected and you would like to appeal, email us a short note of explanation. Sorry!
/3
/3
November 27, 2025 at 2:54 PM
And we will make exceptions for empirical social science research about AI in society – e.g., a study on how AI use affects workers in an organization – on a case-by-case basis. If your paper on an AI topic is rejected and you would like to appeal, email us a short note of explanation. Sorry!
/3
/3
Reposted by Dan Hirschman
1. Pausing new submissions about AI topics for 90 days. That is, papers about AI models, testing AI models, proposing AI models, theories about the future of AI, etc. We will make exceptions for papers that are already accepted for publication (or published) in peer-reviewed scholarly journals
/2
/2
November 27, 2025 at 2:54 PM
1. Pausing new submissions about AI topics for 90 days. That is, papers about AI models, testing AI models, proposing AI models, theories about the future of AI, etc. We will make exceptions for papers that are already accepted for publication (or published) in peer-reviewed scholarly journals
/2
/2