I like the pinball vibe of #1; It's the one that, to me, communicates the most about the game. #4 has the most legible title. I'd consider trying to rework the lighting in #1 to make the title pop a bit more and add some drama.

I drove one of those for many years. Inherited it from my father who bought it new. Its a cool car and I miss it but, no matter how you slice it, owning a 60 year old car is a luxury I couldn't afford.

In my experience rewriting code gets more expensive the further you get into a project. My take is to try to get your rewrites out of the way early if you can.

If you find a good answer, let me know! There are lots of great character artists out there but finding someone to create a capsule for a game that doesn't feature a character is more difficult.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nPe...

That moment when a WSJ article reads like the Onion.

Its pretty common for programmer time estimates to only include the time spent writing the code without considering testing, debugging or, you know, actually shipping something functional. If you don't care whether or not it works using LLMS to help right code might actually be faster.

If you've got it on your phone, A Dark Room is a great game to play when the power is out.

So they disguised a contract software development house as AI so investors would throw money at them? Sounds like the 2025 version of en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pets.com

Meh, almost all new rocket designs fail a few times while they sort things out. However 3 similar failures in a row leaves me wondering if Musk has alienated too many of his staff and the SpaceX engineering team no longer has the skills to fix issues when they come up.