For some reason, my Wikipedia app consistently gives me the wrong picture for the article I look at. Instead of showing me the cover image for the article I'm looking at, it shows me the one for the article I looked at last
November 22, 2025 at 8:19 PM
For some reason, my Wikipedia app consistently gives me the wrong picture for the article I look at. Instead of showing me the cover image for the article I'm looking at, it shows me the one for the article I looked at last
I think Hannibal is the only example of a tv show I've seen where they expect the correct audience reaction from a meat cooking scene (i.e. disgust mixed with the uncomfortable knowledge that it probably does taste good anyway)
November 18, 2025 at 4:51 AM
I think Hannibal is the only example of a tv show I've seen where they expect the correct audience reaction from a meat cooking scene (i.e. disgust mixed with the uncomfortable knowledge that it probably does taste good anyway)
Yinz guys remember when people started calling out "virtue signaling" and after a while it became clear this was really an attack on virtue qua virtue, and before long we realized that the social pressure to perform virtue, even insincerely, was an important bulwark against its total collapse? Yeah.
Yinz guys remember when people started calling out "virtue signaling" and after a while it became clear this was really an attack on virtue qua virtue, and before long we realized that the social pressure to perform virtue, even insincerely, was an important bulwark against its total collapse? Yeah.
I still find annihilationism super unappealing theoretically but I gotta say this does feel like a persuasive "that's what the Bible says" sort of pitch
I still find annihilationism super unappealing theoretically but I gotta say this does feel like a persuasive "that's what the Bible says" sort of pitch
One of the recurrent issues with Oxford's Very Short Introduction series is that way too many of them are history books. Like, why is "Conscience" a history book? That is clearly a psych or philosophy topic
November 11, 2025 at 4:21 AM
One of the recurrent issues with Oxford's Very Short Introduction series is that way too many of them are history books. Like, why is "Conscience" a history book? That is clearly a psych or philosophy topic
I haven't been to a theater in about 4 years. And y'know, going back for the first time in that long, it's really not that great. Watching movies at home is a little worse in a few ways but it's Way Better in a lot of ways and those lot of ways outweigh the few ways
November 8, 2025 at 4:10 AM
I haven't been to a theater in about 4 years. And y'know, going back for the first time in that long, it's really not that great. Watching movies at home is a little worse in a few ways but it's Way Better in a lot of ways and those lot of ways outweigh the few ways
Don't really get the appeal of annihilationism in Christian eschatology. I get the appeal of universalism and the traditional view of hell. Annihilationism seems like a weird middle ground
November 3, 2025 at 3:25 AM
Don't really get the appeal of annihilationism in Christian eschatology. I get the appeal of universalism and the traditional view of hell. Annihilationism seems like a weird middle ground
Trying to write a thing but I have a problem: there is no obvious antonym for "transphobia." If I write "transphilia," that feels more like "chaser" than "transgender supporter" but I'm tempted to use it anyway because fuck you
November 3, 2025 at 1:11 AM
Trying to write a thing but I have a problem: there is no obvious antonym for "transphobia." If I write "transphilia," that feels more like "chaser" than "transgender supporter" but I'm tempted to use it anyway because fuck you