Cocoon
@annemoon.bsky.social
coder, cyclist, knitter. Polyam. Owner of a pet neural net called BriaNN, a pet knitting machine that definitely does not listen to anything, and owned by the neighbours' cats.
hoooly cow du bist echt gut
December 7, 2025 at 4:13 PM
hoooly cow du bist echt gut
ich habe nach den ersten 2 wo es nicht gehalten hat erst nach 8 Wochen getestet, und nun? wtf, echt
December 2, 2025 at 10:17 AM
ich habe nach den ersten 2 wo es nicht gehalten hat erst nach 8 Wochen getestet, und nun? wtf, echt
Reposted by Cocoon
Na gut, eins noch! 🫠
December 2, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Na gut, eins noch! 🫠
Reposted by Cocoon
Geert Wilders, onze ultieme koloniale erfzonde.
November 30, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Geert Wilders, onze ultieme koloniale erfzonde.
Reposted by Cocoon
07:15. Bereits Tausende sind in Gießen
November 29, 2025 at 6:32 AM
07:15. Bereits Tausende sind in Gießen
Reposted by Cocoon
Springer-Nature statement
“Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.”
How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
“Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.”
How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
Riding the Autism Bicycle to Retraction Town
Does anyone *really* know their Factor Fexcectorn?
nobreakthroughs.substack.com
November 28, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Springer-Nature statement
“Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.”
How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
“Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.”
How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
aber beim pinkeln geht doch, oder 👉👈
November 28, 2025 at 5:18 PM
aber beim pinkeln geht doch, oder 👉👈