Anna McCaghren Fleming
@annamccaghren.bsky.social
Assistant Professor of Political Science at Mercer University
Reposted by Anna McCaghren Fleming
And for *some reason* Reuters didn’t put in the headline that the answer was “NO, IT’S FOR WHITES ONLY”
Exclusive: US diplomats asked if non-whites qualify for Trump refugee program for South Africans reut.rs/3H6mYnH
Exclusive: US diplomats asked if non-whites qualify for Trump refugee program for South Africans
In early July, the top official at the U.S. embassy in South Africa reached out to Washington asking for clarification on a contentious U.S. policy: could non-whites apply for a refugee program geared toward white South Africans if they met other requirements?
reut.rs
July 25, 2025 at 7:27 PM
And for *some reason* Reuters didn’t put in the headline that the answer was “NO, IT’S FOR WHITES ONLY”
Reposted by Anna McCaghren Fleming
With Trump's frustrated late night social media rants about his losses in the courts lately, you might be asking - can presidents move public opinion on Court reforms? Our newest open access publication (link below) finds that ⬇️
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/TKMWRV...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/TKMWRV...
May 23, 2025 at 2:30 PM
With Trump's frustrated late night social media rants about his losses in the courts lately, you might be asking - can presidents move public opinion on Court reforms? Our newest open access publication (link below) finds that ⬇️
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/TKMWRV...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/TKMWRV...
Reposted by Anna McCaghren Fleming
I feel like our recent pub about what the public will do if executives ignore the court is unfortunately super relevant at the moment :(
An article my coauthors and I are very proud of got published today. It looks at how partisans are now willing to reward executives for ignoring and sanctioning a Supreme Court they do not agree with. There are some shocking findings for the future of our democracy. doi.org/10.1017/jlc....
Executives Strike Back: Political Benefits of Sanctioning the U.S. Supreme Court | Journal of Law and Courts | Cambridge Core
Executives Strike Back: Political Benefits of Sanctioning the U.S. Supreme Court
doi.org
February 12, 2025 at 2:20 AM
I feel like our recent pub about what the public will do if executives ignore the court is unfortunately super relevant at the moment :(
Reposted by Anna McCaghren Fleming
NEW ISSUE -
Journal of Law and Courts - Volume 12 - Issue 2 - cup.org/3WylRBE
With papers by @zoerobinson.bsky.social, @matthewhitt.bsky.social, @lisanhager.bsky.social, @annamccaghren.bsky.social, @mdm.bsky.social & more
Journal of Law and Courts - Volume 12 - Issue 2 - cup.org/3WylRBE
With papers by @zoerobinson.bsky.social, @matthewhitt.bsky.social, @lisanhager.bsky.social, @annamccaghren.bsky.social, @mdm.bsky.social & more
January 24, 2025 at 2:04 PM
NEW ISSUE -
Journal of Law and Courts - Volume 12 - Issue 2 - cup.org/3WylRBE
With papers by @zoerobinson.bsky.social, @matthewhitt.bsky.social, @lisanhager.bsky.social, @annamccaghren.bsky.social, @mdm.bsky.social & more
Journal of Law and Courts - Volume 12 - Issue 2 - cup.org/3WylRBE
With papers by @zoerobinson.bsky.social, @matthewhitt.bsky.social, @lisanhager.bsky.social, @annamccaghren.bsky.social, @mdm.bsky.social & more