Andy Reisinger
@andyreisinger.bsky.social
Climate science and policy. Also the occasional photo and random thoughts. Currently serving as Commissioner at He Pou A Rangi, New Zealand Climate Change Commission; former IPCC vice-chair WGIII. Usual disclaimers...
As we say in the article: "A world that returns to global warming of 1.5°C will be a significantly altered and more damaged world than if this level of warming had never been exceeded."
November 24, 2025 at 9:19 AM
As we say in the article: "A world that returns to global warming of 1.5°C will be a significantly altered and more damaged world than if this level of warming had never been exceeded."
Sure, but now they will spend the next 10 years arguing over what a better policy looks like, and all the while delay domestic action by pointing to "on-going global discussions" and express their concern that domestic action could create a double burden. It is bad.
October 17, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Sure, but now they will spend the next 10 years arguing over what a better policy looks like, and all the while delay domestic action by pointing to "on-going global discussions" and express their concern that domestic action could create a double burden. It is bad.
Does anybody know where to find a list of how individual countries voted?
October 17, 2025 at 8:11 PM
Does anybody know where to find a list of how individual countries voted?
Reposted by Andy Reisinger
If things were going to plan stuff like this simply wouldn't exist. The goal here is the elimination of fossil fuels, not "lots of batteries" or "lots of solar panels"
October 15, 2025 at 7:15 AM
If things were going to plan stuff like this simply wouldn't exist. The goal here is the elimination of fossil fuels, not "lots of batteries" or "lots of solar panels"