YouTube: Watching Brief
Co-Author: The Buried Spitfires of Burma-A fake history
Tips/Gossip/Commissions: PipeLineNews@protonmail
Signal: AndyBrockman.25
The point here is this describes an arrangement whereby historical artefacts are seen in purely commercial terms, in a way archaeologists excavating the same ground would never see them.
It's part of the increasing evidence, for many, metal detecting is not about the history but the cash.
The point here is this describes an arrangement whereby historical artefacts are seen in purely commercial terms, in a way archaeologists excavating the same ground would never see them.
It's part of the increasing evidence, for many, metal detecting is not about the history but the cash.
"I regret that my misunderstanding of the Code of Conduct and the publication by the Guardian of highly unwelcome articles has damaged my reputation but more significantly risked that of the House of Lords."
"I regret that my misunderstanding of the Code of Conduct and the publication by the Guardian of highly unwelcome articles has damaged my reputation but more significantly risked that of the House of Lords."
The murkey origins of the project and in particular evidence that it was designed as a commercial venture, were explored in this exclusive report in thePipeLine.
The current status of the project is unclear.
The murkey origins of the project and in particular evidence that it was designed as a commercial venture, were explored in this exclusive report in thePipeLine.
The current status of the project is unclear.