Andrew Zammit
banner
andrewzammit.bsky.social
Andrew Zammit
@andrewzammit.bsky.social
Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Victoria University. Interested in terrorism, security and human rights.
Reposted by Andrew Zammit
💡Moving on to some of our most popular intel articles, first up we have James Ramsey and Andrew Macpherson, who asked "Is the academy equipping tomorrow’s intelligence
professionals to analyze data-centric threats?" Read it here & in our upcoming 20th bday collection! 🎉 ➡️ doi.org/10.1080/1833...
November 22, 2025 at 6:35 AM
Reposted by Andrew Zammit
Next up in our most popular and noteworthy policing articles, we have Sophia Yakhlef with "Humour, trust and tacit knowledge of police and border officers in international police collaboration". This one is open access & free to read! ➡️ doi.org/10.1080/1833...
November 20, 2025 at 6:02 AM
Thanks so much Melanie, I’m extremely excited to be presenting there with you.
November 19, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Yes, that’s exactly the one. But it also turned out that there‘s an extremely famous photo of a (non-foreign) militiaman playing a piano during the Lebanese civil war, so I wonder if a few different stories were just conflated together.
November 12, 2025 at 9:33 AM
I remember a similar story, about a French sniper tourist in the Lebanese civil war, but the source was Robert Young Pelton so I can‘t put much stock in it.
November 12, 2025 at 8:49 AM
Out of interest what is the WOTR melodrama? (I’ve been looking for some explanation as to why it has changed in the way it has)
November 1, 2025 at 12:29 AM
Little blast from the last there, I think I can remember you proposing that WOTR should have footnotes way back when it was first established.
October 31, 2025 at 2:39 AM
Good luck!!
October 31, 2025 at 12:02 AM
Just Security? Lawfare? Both more law-focused though. I would have said The Strategy Bridge if still around.
October 30, 2025 at 10:38 PM
They were a brilliant publication for many years, but this year (and probably building up earlier) it has felt like they exist in a different reality.
October 30, 2025 at 10:11 PM
Yeah, and this paragraph was just a rant of “realist warriors being sidelined by bean-counting managerialists”, which is such a widespread cliche that I saw almost the exact same claim being made a day a two earlier in an article by MLR Smith and someone else in Military Strategy Magazine.
October 30, 2025 at 9:40 PM
That was what I initially hoped the article would be!
October 30, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Oh that’s a good article, much more grounded.
October 30, 2025 at 8:18 PM
I tend to resist “they’ve sold out” as explanations for intellectual changes. But their identity has noticeably changed in a way that, say, Lawfare’s hasn’t. And their articles often indeed tend to feel like they have a far weaker relationship with reality than before.
October 30, 2025 at 8:18 PM