Andrew
@andrewmacrae.bsky.social
Retired liberal, computer programmer, writer of short and long mysteries and science fiction, 3D printing enthusiast. Theater hound, would-be wood-worker. Former Midwesterner now living in a ultra-red county in a very blue state.
I am in no way wishing for trump’s death. But a stroke that keeps him from talking is acceptable.
December 12, 2025 at 12:27 AM
I am in no way wishing for trump’s death. But a stroke that keeps him from talking is acceptable.
No foreign troops in Ukraine includes no Russian, right?
December 2, 2025 at 6:03 AM
No foreign troops in Ukraine includes no Russian, right?
That’s a tough looking cat!
November 30, 2025 at 5:54 AM
That’s a tough looking cat!
He has no authority to do so.
November 27, 2025 at 2:35 AM
He has no authority to do so.
Reposted by Andrew
UPDATE: DOJ lawyers state that DHS Sec. Kristi Noem made decision not to return March 15 flights.
Also Tuesday, ACLU lawyers name Emil Bove, now a federal judge, as a possible witness in Boasberg's contempt inquiry over the flights.
My write-thru at Law Dork:
Also Tuesday, ACLU lawyers name Emil Bove, now a federal judge, as a possible witness in Boasberg's contempt inquiry over the flights.
My write-thru at Law Dork:
DOJ lawyers state that DHS Sec. Kristi Noem made decision not to return March 15 flights
Also Tuesday, ACLU lawyers name Emil Bove, now a federal judge, as a possible witness in Boasberg's contempt inquiry over the flights. And, for paid subscribers: Closing my tabs.
www.lawdork.com
November 26, 2025 at 5:25 AM
UPDATE: DOJ lawyers state that DHS Sec. Kristi Noem made decision not to return March 15 flights.
Also Tuesday, ACLU lawyers name Emil Bove, now a federal judge, as a possible witness in Boasberg's contempt inquiry over the flights.
My write-thru at Law Dork:
Also Tuesday, ACLU lawyers name Emil Bove, now a federal judge, as a possible witness in Boasberg's contempt inquiry over the flights.
My write-thru at Law Dork:
I like that they quote Scalia in their brief.
November 22, 2025 at 6:39 AM
I like that they quote Scalia in their brief.
One reason I’ve seen is that attempting to create nine sure-republican districts, they are weakening all of their candidates leaving room for dissatisfied voters to elect democrats.
November 19, 2025 at 2:11 AM
One reason I’ve seen is that attempting to create nine sure-republican districts, they are weakening all of their candidates leaving room for dissatisfied voters to elect democrats.
Reposted by Andrew
Ah, the classic Wimpy legal gambit.
“I would gladly show you (evidence) Tuesday for an indictment today.”
“I would gladly show you (evidence) Tuesday for an indictment today.”
November 17, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Ah, the classic Wimpy legal gambit.
“I would gladly show you (evidence) Tuesday for an indictment today.”
“I would gladly show you (evidence) Tuesday for an indictment today.”