Ha! Do you know anything about what is going on with them?

www.theguardian.com/books/2011/o...

Springer!

Found it! Many thanks.

The distinction between the strict and non-strict version is useful, sure. For instance in analysis, any continuous monotone function is differentiable a.e. But its derivative is never zero if strictly increasing, while the Cantor function, which is non-strictly increasing, has zero derivative a.e.

This was fun! I wouldn't have made a big deal (or a deal at all) about the "too" in the sentence, so I guess it also taught something about English. Again, thank you.

Nice shirt, too.

Thanks. It's been too long since I've read Lakatos. Will revisit.

Cool. Thank you!

😀 Ah, excellent! Again, many thanks.

Now I'm curious. Do you know other examples of papers where, similarly, the authors disagree on some point, and argue their opposite positions separately?
/End

The authors begin by saying that they disagree on the answer. Smith argues for 5 pages that it is No, and then Walker argues for the other 5 that it is Yes.
(Cont.)

"Did the Infantes de Carrión intend to kill the Cid's daughters?"
Colin Smith & Roger M. Walker
Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 56:1, 1-10,
doi.org/10.1080/1475...
(Cont.)