Adi 🇳🇬🇺🇸
@amadiadebayo.bsky.social
please bring the bridge down
not even for strategic reasons but for morale
not even for strategic reasons but for morale
November 24, 2025 at 6:19 PM
please bring the bridge down
not even for strategic reasons but for morale
not even for strategic reasons but for morale
I’d prefer we send our troops to ukraine on the western front to free up ukranians in the front line which is how they used north koreans in kursk, and now inside ukraine.
I’m just saying we’ve been lettng russia dictate what we can and cannot do while they do whatever they please
I’m just saying we’ve been lettng russia dictate what we can and cannot do while they do whatever they please
November 24, 2025 at 8:00 AM
I’d prefer we send our troops to ukraine on the western front to free up ukranians in the front line which is how they used north koreans in kursk, and now inside ukraine.
I’m just saying we’ve been lettng russia dictate what we can and cannot do while they do whatever they please
I’m just saying we’ve been lettng russia dictate what we can and cannot do while they do whatever they please
European countries can’t send their soldiers to ukraine, but russia can have north korean soldiers not only in russia, but also in ukraine 😂
The west is so weak it’s funny
The west is so weak it’s funny
November 24, 2025 at 7:49 AM
European countries can’t send their soldiers to ukraine, but russia can have north korean soldiers not only in russia, but also in ukraine 😂
The west is so weak it’s funny
The west is so weak it’s funny
European countries can’t send their soldiers to ukraine, but russia can have north korean soldiers not only in russia, but also in ukraine 😂
The west is so weak it’s funny
The west is so weak it’s funny
November 24, 2025 at 7:48 AM
European countries can’t send their soldiers to ukraine, but russia can have north korean soldiers not only in russia, but also in ukraine 😂
The west is so weak it’s funny
The west is so weak it’s funny
i guess it’s time to prove these ignorant people wrong
we’re the same country who gave ukraine 2 weeks to fall in 2022. A bit more generous than the 3 days russia and belarus predicted. but let’s remember that - US gave ukraine 2 weeks, almost 4 years ago.
we’re the same country who gave ukraine 2 weeks to fall in 2022. A bit more generous than the 3 days russia and belarus predicted. but let’s remember that - US gave ukraine 2 weeks, almost 4 years ago.
November 24, 2025 at 7:45 AM
i guess it’s time to prove these ignorant people wrong
we’re the same country who gave ukraine 2 weeks to fall in 2022. A bit more generous than the 3 days russia and belarus predicted. but let’s remember that - US gave ukraine 2 weeks, almost 4 years ago.
we’re the same country who gave ukraine 2 weeks to fall in 2022. A bit more generous than the 3 days russia and belarus predicted. but let’s remember that - US gave ukraine 2 weeks, almost 4 years ago.
he’s literally not even an appointed government official right now. yet has more access than ukraine and europe in building this surrender plan
he’s also in geneva right now. again, a civilian with no proper clearance or expertise gets to influence the most security sensitive ops since wwii
he’s also in geneva right now. again, a civilian with no proper clearance or expertise gets to influence the most security sensitive ops since wwii
November 23, 2025 at 11:00 PM
he’s literally not even an appointed government official right now. yet has more access than ukraine and europe in building this surrender plan
he’s also in geneva right now. again, a civilian with no proper clearance or expertise gets to influence the most security sensitive ops since wwii
he’s also in geneva right now. again, a civilian with no proper clearance or expertise gets to influence the most security sensitive ops since wwii
he was also with witkoff and dimitriev in miami when they were developing this surrender plan
it’s messed up that a civilian had access to it and is still part of the ongoing process
it’s messed up that a civilian had access to it and is still part of the ongoing process
November 23, 2025 at 8:04 PM
he was also with witkoff and dimitriev in miami when they were developing this surrender plan
it’s messed up that a civilian had access to it and is still part of the ongoing process
it’s messed up that a civilian had access to it and is still part of the ongoing process
Why is kushner still there?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
November 23, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Why is kushner still there?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
Why is kushner even there?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
November 23, 2025 at 7:53 PM
Why is kushner even there?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
wtf why is this not more pressed in the media?
November 23, 2025 at 7:51 PM
wtf why is this not more pressed in the media?
Why is kushner even there?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
November 23, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Why is kushner even there?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
He’s not a government official. He’s technically a civilian.
Why does a civilian have access to influencing and developing a highly sensitive matter when neither elected US officials - wether democrat or republicans, ukraine, or europe were informed?
equivalent of the trump handshake
November 23, 2025 at 6:02 PM
equivalent of the trump handshake
I think europe would do better if they are more proactive instead of waiting for US to lead all the time, when they are obviously incompetent and/or compromised.
When WWII happened - america didn’t join the allies until few years later. Reality is americans see this as “another european war”
When WWII happened - america didn’t join the allies until few years later. Reality is americans see this as “another european war”
November 23, 2025 at 5:54 PM
I think europe would do better if they are more proactive instead of waiting for US to lead all the time, when they are obviously incompetent and/or compromised.
When WWII happened - america didn’t join the allies until few years later. Reality is americans see this as “another european war”
When WWII happened - america didn’t join the allies until few years later. Reality is americans see this as “another european war”
Wow a 24 point plan that makes sense!
My only concern is why does it always take trump making ultimatums and threats for europe to do something about european security?
Europe needs to be so much more decisive that there can’t be any room for the US or russia to control what happens in europe
My only concern is why does it always take trump making ultimatums and threats for europe to do something about european security?
Europe needs to be so much more decisive that there can’t be any room for the US or russia to control what happens in europe
November 23, 2025 at 5:48 PM
Wow a 24 point plan that makes sense!
My only concern is why does it always take trump making ultimatums and threats for europe to do something about european security?
Europe needs to be so much more decisive that there can’t be any room for the US or russia to control what happens in europe
My only concern is why does it always take trump making ultimatums and threats for europe to do something about european security?
Europe needs to be so much more decisive that there can’t be any room for the US or russia to control what happens in europe
That would be one of the least concerns to be honesy, because with proper security guarantees and in peace time, Ukraine won’t necessarily need 800,000 soldiers anyways.
And it would be easy enough to circumvent it by using “non traditional” soldiers such as reserve force, police, militia etc
And it would be easy enough to circumvent it by using “non traditional” soldiers such as reserve force, police, militia etc
November 23, 2025 at 5:45 PM
That would be one of the least concerns to be honesy, because with proper security guarantees and in peace time, Ukraine won’t necessarily need 800,000 soldiers anyways.
And it would be easy enough to circumvent it by using “non traditional” soldiers such as reserve force, police, militia etc
And it would be easy enough to circumvent it by using “non traditional” soldiers such as reserve force, police, militia etc
sorry zelensky - you’re talking about astrophysics level concepts, american politicians won’t be able to comprehend it.
November 23, 2025 at 5:15 PM
sorry zelensky - you’re talking about astrophysics level concepts, american politicians won’t be able to comprehend it.
I understand why zelensky does it, so that everyone cannot have an excuse that ukraine is being uncooperative.
russia keeps getting extra two weeks while escalating, meanwhile ukraine keeps getting pressured to surrender by US even though they even agreed to trump’s initial ceasefire proposal.
russia keeps getting extra two weeks while escalating, meanwhile ukraine keeps getting pressured to surrender by US even though they even agreed to trump’s initial ceasefire proposal.
November 23, 2025 at 4:59 PM
I understand why zelensky does it, so that everyone cannot have an excuse that ukraine is being uncooperative.
russia keeps getting extra two weeks while escalating, meanwhile ukraine keeps getting pressured to surrender by US even though they even agreed to trump’s initial ceasefire proposal.
russia keeps getting extra two weeks while escalating, meanwhile ukraine keeps getting pressured to surrender by US even though they even agreed to trump’s initial ceasefire proposal.
Calling Ukrainian language a dialect when it’s been a language 700 years before russian was spoken, is peak russian fascism and re writing of history.
November 23, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Calling Ukrainian language a dialect when it’s been a language 700 years before russian was spoken, is peak russian fascism and re writing of history.
Calling Ukrainian language a dialect when it’s been a language 700 years before russian was spoken, is peak russian fascism and re writing of history.
November 23, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Calling Ukrainian language a dialect when it’s been a language 700 years before russian was spoken, is peak russian fascism and re writing of history.
“ukraine input” my ass
As if Ukraine would propose any of the 28 points of the surrender plan
As if Ukraine would propose any of the 28 points of the surrender plan
November 23, 2025 at 4:38 AM
“ukraine input” my ass
As if Ukraine would propose any of the 28 points of the surrender plan
As if Ukraine would propose any of the 28 points of the surrender plan
it’s warranted. Biden was indecisive. He wouldn’t even let ukraine strike russia with US weapons, even those that are literally 1km from the border until 2024.
Sure he was way better than trump, but many of ukraine’s front line problems right now could have been mitigated if he was decisive.
Sure he was way better than trump, but many of ukraine’s front line problems right now could have been mitigated if he was decisive.
November 23, 2025 at 4:36 AM
it’s warranted. Biden was indecisive. He wouldn’t even let ukraine strike russia with US weapons, even those that are literally 1km from the border until 2024.
Sure he was way better than trump, but many of ukraine’s front line problems right now could have been mitigated if he was decisive.
Sure he was way better than trump, but many of ukraine’s front line problems right now could have been mitigated if he was decisive.
in my opinion Ukraine was in a worse position in 2022 versus now.
So I dont see any reason for ukraine to accept this surrender plan right now.
At worst, they should wait out until 2026 when the house has a big chance of getting flipped to the democracts in the mid term elections.
So I dont see any reason for ukraine to accept this surrender plan right now.
At worst, they should wait out until 2026 when the house has a big chance of getting flipped to the democracts in the mid term elections.
November 23, 2025 at 4:32 AM
in my opinion Ukraine was in a worse position in 2022 versus now.
So I dont see any reason for ukraine to accept this surrender plan right now.
At worst, they should wait out until 2026 when the house has a big chance of getting flipped to the democracts in the mid term elections.
So I dont see any reason for ukraine to accept this surrender plan right now.
At worst, they should wait out until 2026 when the house has a big chance of getting flipped to the democracts in the mid term elections.