New book, LITTLE KINGDOMS, out now!: https://www.pen-and-sword.co.uk/Little-Kingdoms-Hardback/p/56542
Published w/ Cambridge Uni, Pen & Sword, Amberley
LITTLE KINGDOMS is not a book about this story. It offers 62 beginnings, rather than an ending
LITTLE KINGDOMS is not a book about this story. It offers 62 beginnings, rather than an ending
History is often written by them, you might have heard, and in so doing, much nuance and truth is sacrificed on the altar of clean, linear narratives
For example, you’ve no doubt all heard a variation of the ‘unification of Anglo-Saxon England’, oft told from the POV of Wessex
History is often written by them, you might have heard, and in so doing, much nuance and truth is sacrificed on the altar of clean, linear narratives
For example, you’ve no doubt all heard a variation of the ‘unification of Anglo-Saxon England’, oft told from the POV of Wessex
Not an ‘academic’ book per say, nor non-fiction, but given its Old English/ Welsh blood I’d like to commemorate re-reading it in my book thread. Certainly, at least, Tolkien’s wordsmithing has been very inspiring for my own ongoing / future works
Not an ‘academic’ book per say, nor non-fiction, but given its Old English/ Welsh blood I’d like to commemorate re-reading it in my book thread. Certainly, at least, Tolkien’s wordsmithing has been very inspiring for my own ongoing / future works
I hope LITTLE KINGDOMS follows suit!
I hope LITTLE KINGDOMS follows suit!
This alphabetical inclusion might be a bit of a reach, but…
This alphabetical inclusion might be a bit of a reach, but…
Like, just "old" =/= of value, IMO
Like, just "old" =/= of value, IMO
John Baker has a brilliant paper questioning the utility of these names; I agree w/ him that they were probs just for administrators and not the locals (2/2)
John Baker has a brilliant paper questioning the utility of these names; I agree w/ him that they were probs just for administrators and not the locals (2/2)