Alex Bozikovic
banner
alexbozikovic.bsky.social
Alex Bozikovic
@alexbozikovic.bsky.social
Architecture critic @theglobeandmail.com. Also author, University of Toronto Daniels Faculty instructor, husband, father of two city kids.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/authors/alex-bozikovic/
pushing out United Bakers would be bad. It would also be incredibly dumb, and if this development happens, the owners will certainly try hard to keep them.

Finally: if you are 77, you should want to ensure that your favourite restaurant has a future. That means more people.
November 21, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Ontario planning policy, which prevails, calls for intensification in existing cities. Toronto planning has been slow walking this for 20 years now, but among a few places that they allow density is… commercial sites on major streets.
November 21, 2025 at 7:03 PM
These new apartments would be great for local seniors to downsize into. This development would destroy zero housing.
November 21, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Last night at U of T, Alfredo Caraballo explaining Allies & Morrison’s position on tall buildings. Varied components don’t just break down the scale up close, but also provide different views from different directions, so that the tower has a different presence across the broader landscape.
November 21, 2025 at 6:40 PM
This is Lille, population 240,000. If downtown Cleveland looked like this, preferences would look different.
November 19, 2025 at 1:07 AM
2016-2021
November 16, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Almost everywhere in the City of Toronto has fewer people that it did 50 years ago
November 15, 2025 at 9:48 PM
November 15, 2025 at 1:35 PM
Phyllis Lambert, still posting.
November 14, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Vimy Ridge.
November 11, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Almost certainly contextual, probably nothing in the other categories.

The contextual criterion basically means: this is an old neighbourhood and we should leave it the way it is. I disagree that this should override all social and economic considerations.
November 11, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Nice house, little of heritage significance, sold for $3.85-million. 100m from Bathurst subway station
November 11, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Jane Jacobs’s house, now with Audi SUV
November 11, 2025 at 2:00 PM
Some random group of NIMBYs, claiming to speak for all of Toronto, is deeply concerned about neighbourhood stores.

The spokesperson (frequent activist vs planning reform) lives in a wealthy, deeply suburban part of Etobicoke.

These people speak for no one, and ought to be ignored.

cot-ra.org
November 10, 2025 at 4:02 PM
November 7, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Principles for this project, funded by the Weston family
November 7, 2025 at 1:02 AM
“Tree walk”
November 7, 2025 at 1:00 AM
The paved plaza, minus statue, with kiosk building at left
November 7, 2025 at 12:59 AM
“The grove”
November 7, 2025 at 12:58 AM
“White oak savanna restoration area”
November 7, 2025 at 12:57 AM
Fresh drawings of the plans for Queen’s Park North by JRALA. Scaled back.
November 7, 2025 at 12:54 AM
Toronto desperately needs a positive vision for its future. Mayor Chow has not given us this.
November 5, 2025 at 4:32 PM
The councillor is not even pretending that this is about anything but houses.

“Community acclaim”
November 4, 2025 at 12:28 AM
If a new heritage district is created, it should acknowledge the tradeoffs and explicitly define how the area will change.
November 3, 2025 at 3:55 AM
Not shown in this drawing: the indoor waterpark, which is the size of a stadium
October 28, 2025 at 9:43 PM