This was eye opening: theipsa.org.uk/what-i-learn...

Related to the ACM journal using terrible AI summaries of academic articles anil.recoil.org/notes/acm-ai...

Hi Mark, thanks for this. Is there an article or written summary about this you'd recommend? AJP

As a request, I appreciate google forms are convenient for input but I'd like to check I wasn't submitting existing ideas that have already been suggested. For example drone delivery of parcels, personal rain water storage tanks, solar panel tiles, personal jump jet equipped emergencies services etc

... where I try to (unsuccessfully) capture the behaviour. I get confused about the "Enter" key not working / deleting paragraphs, but I think that's unrelated to the disappearing data bug:
youtu.be/af2duMAquoo
youtu.be/TWsyd9ivmGY

I'll DM you a link to the error messages I saw in the console. Thx

Hey @leaflet.pub, alas the problem happened again. This time I didn't lose any work as I copy and pasted it to the clipboard before refreshing the page. On looking in the console there's a whole bunch of errors and some of them sound very relevant to the problem. Here's a couple of videos...

... supposed to be very serious; a reviewer once literally told me that my paper was “too fun” and that I should make it more boring.

💥 That's academic publishing broken in its purest form.

... journals but writing about science this way is verboten.

For instance, in a journal you’re not allowed to say things like “we don’t know why this happens.” You’re not allowed to admit that you forgot why you ran a study. And you’re DEFINITELY not allowed to talk about Dyngus Day. You’re ...

We need more scientific papers like this! Shockingly I was not shocked to read www.experimental-history.com/i/84559197/a... :

> The paper you just read could never be published in a scientific journal. The studies themselves are just as good as the ones Ethan and I have published in fancy ...