@stutteringcraig.bsky.social you‘re an absolute rube who can’t do research and can’t think for yourself. Instead you let a malfunctioning robot feed you what you want to hear. You’re not a rebel. You’re the mouthpiece of billionaires. I’m shocked you didn’t use MechaHitler for your source.

They weren’t even that small a portion. They were two to three times more that his numbers. But that’s what happens when your only source in ChatGPT, which he admits on his show.

Ok, I bit the bullet and watched his vid and, surprise surprise, he did ask ChatGPT. That’s his source. He uploaded a screenshot to it and asked how likely those people would be in that scene at that time. And it most certainly completely made it all up. Stop trusting that a racist did his research.

Don’t assume someone with no listed sources is telling the truth. I’m tired of people arguing with bad faith actors on their terms.

Everyone here is talking as if he’s right but who cares. Did anyone fact check his assertions? Doing a lookup of “Chicago Demographics 1880” brings up no quick answers. I wonder if he just ChatGPTed it.

Seems so since he blocked me. Someone should check Jon’s work to make sure it isn’t plagiarized slop.

Jon, you’re literally a writer working on books about film and TV. Are you really not bothered by GenAI that is turning your work and the work of people you admire into slop?

Thanks for admitting you’re hysterical over Jerry. Try to be calmer in public.

You seem upset about Jerry. But spoke to you rationally anywayt. I guess you’re not capable of the same.

Also, it wasn’t just some “goofy work place comedy”. It was an optimistic treatise on how government can work for people, even when those people don’t appreciate it.

This is a complete misread of the show. Jerry constantly screwed up. He was, in fact, bad at his job. That’s why the catch phrase “damnit Jerry!” exists. The man fell in a creek chasing a buritto. The joke about his family being amazing is supposed to be in contrast to what a loser he is.

This appears to be completely true. And when I messaged the mods to ask why they muted me for a month. Of course, I also called out a post for using AI slop in it, so could be either one…

I don’t know which scenario is funnier: If the Trump office generated some slop and had it printed on canvas, or if some grifter generated the slop and sold it to them as a painting.

What’s hilarious about this is that the GOP has been infighting for decades. And every time it does it becomes more fascist and wins more elections. Contract with America->Neocons->Tea Party->MAGA. Meanwhile dems are still clinging to sex pest Clintons.

Tax them and reign them in. Did you not actually read what I wrote?

Lol, spoken like a true reactionary centrist.

She focused on getting conservative votes more than progressive ones. She’d be the president of them too, right?

That’s learned helplessness. Dems can’t even support a non-sex pest in NYC. how can you defend that? How could you defend voting for Newsom taking away trans rights and flooding the world with AI slop? I am warning dems 2 years before the election to run a good candidate. If they don’t listen 🤷🏻‍♀️

I was around in 2001-2008. Were you? We didn’t need Dubya lite running. We needed someone who embraced actual progressives not the people who bombed the world into a complete mess for oil.