4. Finally, & I guess more generally
in life, TAKE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR YOUR ACTIONS!
Waltz and Hegseth made a major mistake which luckily wasn’t costly from a military or human perspective, yet they won’t admit it.
End of message. End of broadcast.
#signal #hegseth #signalgate #trump #waltz
4. Finally, & I guess more generally
in life, TAKE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR YOUR ACTIONS!
Waltz and Hegseth made a major mistake which luckily wasn’t costly from a military or human perspective, yet they won’t admit it.
End of message. End of broadcast.
#signal #hegseth #signalgate #trump #waltz
3. Regularly audit your group chat attendees to make sure you know exactly who you’re talking to, even if you didn’t set up the group chat.
4. Assume you’re being monitored, whether it be your organisation’s SOC or a hostile actor. With an accredited system, it’s less likely to be the latter…
3. Regularly audit your group chat attendees to make sure you know exactly who you’re talking to, even if you didn’t set up the group chat.
4. Assume you’re being monitored, whether it be your organisation’s SOC or a hostile actor. With an accredited system, it’s less likely to be the latter…
So, what do I want anyone reading this to take away:
1. Don’t vilify the use of @signal.org. It’s one of the best apps for the job, so long as it’s used correctly within the confines of classified information handling protocols.
2. Know what classified information is and how to handle it.
So, what do I want anyone reading this to take away:
1. Don’t vilify the use of @signal.org. It’s one of the best apps for the job, so long as it’s used correctly within the confines of classified information handling protocols.
2. Know what classified information is and how to handle it.
Just as important as knowing your classifications is knowing who you’re talking to.
I can’t believe nobody, at any point, thought to audit who was included in the group chat - Especially those who didn’t participate in the conversations.
Just as important as knowing your classifications is knowing who you’re talking to.
I can’t believe nobody, at any point, thought to audit who was included in the group chat - Especially those who didn’t participate in the conversations.
There isn’t anything wrong with the use of Signal per se, it’s one of the best platforms out there and govts. all over the world incl. the UK govt use it… But users MUST be strict with limiting its usage to appropriate classifications, and only on official devices.
There isn’t anything wrong with the use of Signal per se, it’s one of the best platforms out there and govts. all over the world incl. the UK govt use it… But users MUST be strict with limiting its usage to appropriate classifications, and only on official devices.
Note an earlier message from Waltz, they were using their high side inboxes - accredited for security sensitive information - so it seems they were being lax (or taking the path of least resistance) in discussing more than they should on Signal…
Note an earlier message from Waltz, they were using their high side inboxes - accredited for security sensitive information - so it seems they were being lax (or taking the path of least resistance) in discussing more than they should on Signal…
If US cyber and infosec guidance is aligned to UK policy, then that sort of information absolutely CANNOT be shared on Signal, no matter whether it was an official device or not.
If US cyber and infosec guidance is aligned to UK policy, then that sort of information absolutely CANNOT be shared on Signal, no matter whether it was an official device or not.
I don’t have experience in US military operational planning, but in the UK the information contained in the screenshot above would absolutely be classified secret, per the UK GCS guidance.
I don’t have experience in US military operational planning, but in the UK the information contained in the screenshot above would absolutely be classified secret, per the UK GCS guidance.
Hi Bluesky 👋🏻
Hi Bluesky 👋🏻