Adam Shostack :donor: :rebelverified:
@adamshostack.infosec.exchange.ap.brid.gy
Author, game designer, technologist, teacher.
Helped to create the CVE and many other things. Fixed autorun for XP. On Blackhat Review board.
Books […]
[bridged from https://infosec.exchange/@adamshostack on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]
Helped to create the CVE and many other things. Fixed autorun for XP. On Blackhat Review board.
Books […]
[bridged from https://infosec.exchange/@adamshostack on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]
@UKFilmNerd Seriously? That's their Enterprise? With 3600 bricks, I'd really expect much a rounder look to the saucer
November 2, 2025 at 10:40 PM
@UKFilmNerd Seriously? That's their Enterprise? With 3600 bricks, I'd really expect much a rounder look to the saucer
@sleepycat Thanks for the boost! That version doesn’t have it, but in the version I’m giving at owasp next week I’ll talk about how public health tools (incidence, defined harms, measured interventions) could help.
November 1, 2025 at 1:48 AM
@sleepycat Thanks for the boost! That version doesn’t have it, but in the version I’m giving at owasp next week I’ll talk about how public health tools (incidence, defined harms, measured interventions) could help.
Reposted by Adam Shostack :donor: :rebelverified:
The FCC has published the text of the proposed order undoing its cyber requirements for telecoms, which will get a vote at next month's meeting: docs.fcc.gov/public/attac...
It says the requirements lacked legal standing and wouldn't be as effective as "an agile and collaborative approach."
It says the requirements lacked legal standing and wouldn't be as effective as "an agile and collaborative approach."
October 30, 2025 at 10:59 PM
@ericjgeller.com Is the "order that puts us on a stronger footing" available?
October 30, 2025 at 10:51 PM
@ericjgeller.com Is the "order that puts us on a stronger footing" available?
@hdm It's too bad your scope doesn't formally include "0day dropped at our event and found as we sweep up."
"Austin Hackers Anonymous is now a CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) for vulnerabilities in the AHA! website and other AHA! controlled assets, as well as vulnerabilities identified in assets […]
"Austin Hackers Anonymous is now a CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) for vulnerabilities in the AHA! website and other AHA! controlled assets, as well as vulnerabilities identified in assets […]
Original post on infosec.exchange
infosec.exchange
October 30, 2025 at 9:39 PM
@hdm It's too bad your scope doesn't formally include "0day dropped at our event and found as we sweep up."
"Austin Hackers Anonymous is now a CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) for vulnerabilities in the AHA! website and other AHA! controlled assets, as well as vulnerabilities identified in assets […]
"Austin Hackers Anonymous is now a CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) for vulnerabilities in the AHA! website and other AHA! controlled assets, as well as vulnerabilities identified in assets […]