Andrew James Carter
@acarter.bsky.social
Here for the post-apocalypse and the post apocalypse.
Autistic
He/Him
Autistic
He/Him
With bonus points for the arched eyebrow.
November 18, 2025 at 8:54 PM
With bonus points for the arched eyebrow.
Kinnock criticises Starmer for failing to articulate the “purpose” of his government.
Just hours later, Starmer tweets a bunch of vague statements (that fail to articulate anything) and says “That’s the purpose of my government”.
The guy just doesn’t get it, does he?
Just hours later, Starmer tweets a bunch of vague statements (that fail to articulate anything) and says “That’s the purpose of my government”.
The guy just doesn’t get it, does he?
October 21, 2025 at 7:57 AM
Kinnock criticises Starmer for failing to articulate the “purpose” of his government.
Just hours later, Starmer tweets a bunch of vague statements (that fail to articulate anything) and says “That’s the purpose of my government”.
The guy just doesn’t get it, does he?
Just hours later, Starmer tweets a bunch of vague statements (that fail to articulate anything) and says “That’s the purpose of my government”.
The guy just doesn’t get it, does he?
How to earn yourself an instant block.
October 20, 2025 at 4:04 PM
How to earn yourself an instant block.
Instead of reversing the decline in GP numbers, Labour are somehow going to find 6,229 people “specially trained” at forcing disabled people into poverty.
![Excerpt from a report by the Royal College of General Practitioners, published on the 8th of September 2025, reading: “In January 2018, there were 7,254 open active [GP surgeries]. As of July 2025, this figure has dropped to 6,229.”](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:jp3uoxbywluhgkkr2d7lj3km/bafkreidfiilff22xk572uubbqpzuq43rhw7tky3cwwu2wux5lsifjf7b5a@jpeg)
October 9, 2025 at 8:15 AM
Instead of reversing the decline in GP numbers, Labour are somehow going to find 6,229 people “specially trained” at forcing disabled people into poverty.
Pictured: “Very Few”
September 27, 2025 at 8:56 AM
Pictured: “Very Few”
oh no
whatever will I do
whatever will I do
September 26, 2025 at 8:26 AM
oh no
whatever will I do
whatever will I do
This is what Starmer thinks counts as “progressive”.
Opposing hateful *rhetoric* while *doing* hateful things.
This is not progressive. This is not even a “fightback”. This is just the same pandering to racists, but with a more dishonest spin.
Opposing hateful *rhetoric* while *doing* hateful things.
This is not progressive. This is not even a “fightback”. This is just the same pandering to racists, but with a more dishonest spin.
September 26, 2025 at 7:29 AM
This is what Starmer thinks counts as “progressive”.
Opposing hateful *rhetoric* while *doing* hateful things.
This is not progressive. This is not even a “fightback”. This is just the same pandering to racists, but with a more dishonest spin.
Opposing hateful *rhetoric* while *doing* hateful things.
This is not progressive. This is not even a “fightback”. This is just the same pandering to racists, but with a more dishonest spin.
🎶 Brit Card
Brit Card
Here’s my Brit Card
Now please don’t arrest me
Mr Fascist Border Guard 🎶
Brit Card
Here’s my Brit Card
Now please don’t arrest me
Mr Fascist Border Guard 🎶
September 25, 2025 at 4:20 PM
🎶 Brit Card
Brit Card
Here’s my Brit Card
Now please don’t arrest me
Mr Fascist Border Guard 🎶
Brit Card
Here’s my Brit Card
Now please don’t arrest me
Mr Fascist Border Guard 🎶
1) It replaces the deleted post because you’re trying to hide your ableism…
2) …but you couldn’t be bothered to hide it in the text of the article, which still says “the autism problem”
3) Either way, you’re framing bullshit as medically plausible
4) Stop promoting eugenics, you fucking ghouls
2) …but you couldn’t be bothered to hide it in the text of the article, which still says “the autism problem”
3) Either way, you’re framing bullshit as medically plausible
4) Stop promoting eugenics, you fucking ghouls
![Cutting from the article with the highlighted ableist phrasing “Trump … blames [critics] for for standing by while the autism problem worsened.”
The article is not quoting someone here. This is how Politico chose to frame autism - quite literally borrowing the language of Nazi eugenics.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:jp3uoxbywluhgkkr2d7lj3km/bafkreib6nc4tx3w4gjuim5h62aquf42fgbhzag5glswffharouaoas42tu@jpeg)
September 24, 2025 at 7:14 AM
1) It replaces the deleted post because you’re trying to hide your ableism…
2) …but you couldn’t be bothered to hide it in the text of the article, which still says “the autism problem”
3) Either way, you’re framing bullshit as medically plausible
4) Stop promoting eugenics, you fucking ghouls
2) …but you couldn’t be bothered to hide it in the text of the article, which still says “the autism problem”
3) Either way, you’re framing bullshit as medically plausible
4) Stop promoting eugenics, you fucking ghouls
Oh no, the bigot apologist blocked me, whatever shall I do…
September 5, 2025 at 11:22 AM
Oh no, the bigot apologist blocked me, whatever shall I do…
Reminder that if you are subscribed to the guardian, you are funding their relentless, dishonest hate campaign against the trans community.
After toning down their bigotry recently, they’re seemingly now back to championing abuse, harassment and hate.
After toning down their bigotry recently, they’re seemingly now back to championing abuse, harassment and hate.
September 3, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Reminder that if you are subscribed to the guardian, you are funding their relentless, dishonest hate campaign against the trans community.
After toning down their bigotry recently, they’re seemingly now back to championing abuse, harassment and hate.
After toning down their bigotry recently, they’re seemingly now back to championing abuse, harassment and hate.
Found it. Hussain’s call for segregation, followed by Ali’s apologism for it - in which he compares trans activists to racists; accuses them of sabotage; and calls trans solidarity “purity testing”.
Plus receipts for him dodging the LGBTQ+ Green survey.
Plus receipts for him dodging the LGBTQ+ Green survey.
![Tweet from Adnan Hussain (Your Party) quoting transphobic account “Manchester Feminists” in which he agrees with a transphobic dogwhistle; falsely claims women and trans rights are in conflict; and calls for trans people to be segregated.
Quoted Tweet: “The left purports to have material analysis of society, and needs to have a material analysis of sex too. A new left wing party should recognise this reality and not parrot the same neoliberal idea of [transohobic dogwhistle] gender ideology.”
Hussain’s reply: “I agree, woman’s rights and safe spaces should not be encroached upon. Safe third spaces should be an alternative option.”](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:jp3uoxbywluhgkkr2d7lj3km/bafkreiap2bcjvsnb7lks7k7dmkb435jw4rz56nqiz5rfj4mtlvplmnccdi@jpeg)
September 2, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Found it. Hussain’s call for segregation, followed by Ali’s apologism for it - in which he compares trans activists to racists; accuses them of sabotage; and calls trans solidarity “purity testing”.
Plus receipts for him dodging the LGBTQ+ Green survey.
Plus receipts for him dodging the LGBTQ+ Green survey.
lol - tried to find the official document and stumbled across this on White House dot gov
September 2, 2025 at 8:25 AM
lol - tried to find the official document and stumbled across this on White House dot gov
You can’t just “support flags”.
They’re symbols. They each mean something different. Do you support China’s flag? Or Russia’s? Or the *swastika*??
We know you don’t remotely support any pride flag 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️, so who is this lie for??
They’re symbols. They each mean something different. Do you support China’s flag? Or Russia’s? Or the *swastika*??
We know you don’t remotely support any pride flag 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️, so who is this lie for??
September 1, 2025 at 2:43 PM
You can’t just “support flags”.
They’re symbols. They each mean something different. Do you support China’s flag? Or Russia’s? Or the *swastika*??
We know you don’t remotely support any pride flag 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️, so who is this lie for??
They’re symbols. They each mean something different. Do you support China’s flag? Or Russia’s? Or the *swastika*??
We know you don’t remotely support any pride flag 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️, so who is this lie for??
Okay… Tony, this kinda makes me feel like you didn’t understand my point.
To be clear - *YOU* are engaging in appeasement here. *YOU* are telling people they’re helping the fascists win while doing the one thing we know from history *always* helps the fascists win.
To be clear - *YOU* are engaging in appeasement here. *YOU* are telling people they’re helping the fascists win while doing the one thing we know from history *always* helps the fascists win.
August 30, 2025 at 3:47 PM
Okay… Tony, this kinda makes me feel like you didn’t understand my point.
To be clear - *YOU* are engaging in appeasement here. *YOU* are telling people they’re helping the fascists win while doing the one thing we know from history *always* helps the fascists win.
To be clear - *YOU* are engaging in appeasement here. *YOU* are telling people they’re helping the fascists win while doing the one thing we know from history *always* helps the fascists win.
Giant mayonnaise gummy bear
August 30, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Giant mayonnaise gummy bear
The problem with Farage's plan is not that it's racist, cruel or dishonest.
No, Farage has committed the worst centrist sin imaginable.
Farage's plan is...
*CONTENT WARNING*
...impractical.
No, Farage has committed the worst centrist sin imaginable.
Farage's plan is...
*CONTENT WARNING*
...impractical.
August 26, 2025 at 5:27 PM
The problem with Farage's plan is not that it's racist, cruel or dishonest.
No, Farage has committed the worst centrist sin imaginable.
Farage's plan is...
*CONTENT WARNING*
...impractical.
No, Farage has committed the worst centrist sin imaginable.
Farage's plan is...
*CONTENT WARNING*
...impractical.
At no point in this technologically illiterate absurdity does the Guardian declare it is a paid shill for the faltering AI industry.
AI is not sentient. It is an algorithm that guesses a valid next word in a sentence with sufficient accuracy to fool people into thinking it knows things. It doesn’t.
AI is not sentient. It is an algorithm that guesses a valid next word in a sentence with sufficient accuracy to fool people into thinking it knows things. It doesn’t.
August 26, 2025 at 7:58 AM
At no point in this technologically illiterate absurdity does the Guardian declare it is a paid shill for the faltering AI industry.
AI is not sentient. It is an algorithm that guesses a valid next word in a sentence with sufficient accuracy to fool people into thinking it knows things. It doesn’t.
AI is not sentient. It is an algorithm that guesses a valid next word in a sentence with sufficient accuracy to fool people into thinking it knows things. It doesn’t.
Took me a while, but I think I found what you mean
August 22, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Took me a while, but I think I found what you mean
You clearly do not *remotely* know your history.
August 14, 2025 at 3:55 PM
You clearly do not *remotely* know your history.
Well he’s done it now. Nazi salutes from the roof of the White House. It’s only a matter of time now before Trump suffers no consequences whatsoever because every institution is venal and corrupt and nothing matters.
August 5, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Well he’s done it now. Nazi salutes from the roof of the White House. It’s only a matter of time now before Trump suffers no consequences whatsoever because every institution is venal and corrupt and nothing matters.
I spent the duration of his time in Game of Thrones going “Where do I know that guy from?” before later realising the nervous college kid who died after 2 scenes in Buffy S4 E1 (15 years earlier) was Pedro Pascal.
August 5, 2025 at 7:32 AM
I spent the duration of his time in Game of Thrones going “Where do I know that guy from?” before later realising the nervous college kid who died after 2 scenes in Buffy S4 E1 (15 years earlier) was Pedro Pascal.