Nash isn't saying you aren't allowed to be disheartened or sad about the state of the world. But it's the state of the WORLD; you can express your emotional reaction to it but you don't get to impose your feelings on everyone else and overwrite theirs

Describing bad things in the world isn't doomerism by itself, and not what Nash is talking about.

Doomerism is looking at bad things in the world and choosing nihilism in response, and the op is a criticism of the people that get obnoxious about it to others

Firaxis did, and that's how we got Xcom

The Washington Commmandersons

That said, I'm a huge fan of the redesigns, both in terms of aesthetics and their stats being more in line with other ships of their classes

I think most users of legacy Paranid capitals choose them because of their statlines

Me?

Could it be you weren't raptured because you didn't fart hard enough?

are the dogs the clientele, or the employees

Loved the implication that hamsters can and do receive this training, and her only concern is that this particular hamster hasn't received it yet

Kid Vid

Important note: LLM performance will regress, but prices won't. Investor subsidies were what allowed AI companies to give their product away for free or at far below cost.

Without that, users will have to bear the true, full cost of LLMs. So they'll wind up paying more for worse results.

The question then is whether or not generative AI justifies its costs. Seems like we're about to find out as genAI companies run out of VC funding and customers start learning how much it actually takes to run these algorithms

Channeling McEldowney, I see

Who's that dapper swindler out Tammany Hall?

This should be easily doable since the data exists and you aren't just making up unfounded claims, correct?

Stating "the data is there to analyze" is a rather unconvincing argument when you could instead, perhaps, actually present the data and analysis