Occasional :3-er
@32percentcat.bsky.social
Dumb cat with too many hobbies, voted Britain's most useless three years running
18+
22 - He/they but with a fat ass.
18+
22 - He/they but with a fat ass.
What a good drone :3
November 7, 2025 at 5:55 PM
What a good drone :3
This is the exact correct expression for getting scritches like that :3
November 3, 2025 at 11:10 PM
This is the exact correct expression for getting scritches like that :3
Trying to think of what got silicone oil (for oiling, not latex) off my hands most effectively.
May have been fairy liquid or horribly commercial hand soap?
Probably not great for skin on the rest of the body though
May have been fairy liquid or horribly commercial hand soap?
Probably not great for skin on the rest of the body though
November 3, 2025 at 1:07 AM
Trying to think of what got silicone oil (for oiling, not latex) off my hands most effectively.
May have been fairy liquid or horribly commercial hand soap?
Probably not great for skin on the rest of the body though
May have been fairy liquid or horribly commercial hand soap?
Probably not great for skin on the rest of the body though
Every day is a day for learning!
November 2, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Every day is a day for learning!
Definitely haven't been slowly corrupted to enjoy musk over the last year.
Definitely.
Definitely.
November 2, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Definitely haven't been slowly corrupted to enjoy musk over the last year.
Definitely.
Definitely.
I support this course of action
October 31, 2025 at 1:03 AM
I support this course of action
Oh hell yeah :D
October 27, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Oh hell yeah :D
Legally the same but let's be honest laws kinda stupid sometimes.
Id agree with you there, but I don't believe the use of AI has anything to do with that distinction.
Id agree with you there, but I don't believe the use of AI has anything to do with that distinction.
October 26, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Legally the same but let's be honest laws kinda stupid sometimes.
Id agree with you there, but I don't believe the use of AI has anything to do with that distinction.
Id agree with you there, but I don't believe the use of AI has anything to do with that distinction.
Say I get payed for doing a painting in the style of van Gogh.
Is that taking from others for profit?
If I do it for a living artist?
What if a machine does it?
Where's the line drawn at.
I don't find I can easily draw that line based purely on the usage.
Is that taking from others for profit?
If I do it for a living artist?
What if a machine does it?
Where's the line drawn at.
I don't find I can easily draw that line based purely on the usage.
October 26, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Say I get payed for doing a painting in the style of van Gogh.
Is that taking from others for profit?
If I do it for a living artist?
What if a machine does it?
Where's the line drawn at.
I don't find I can easily draw that line based purely on the usage.
Is that taking from others for profit?
If I do it for a living artist?
What if a machine does it?
Where's the line drawn at.
I don't find I can easily draw that line based purely on the usage.
I refer you back to "take one copy, plagiarism"
"Take parts from thousands- not plagiarism"
There is clearly some fuzzy line where one becomes the other, but an AI likely takes less from each individual thing than a humans work by virtue of scale
"Take parts from thousands- not plagiarism"
There is clearly some fuzzy line where one becomes the other, but an AI likely takes less from each individual thing than a humans work by virtue of scale
October 26, 2025 at 12:38 PM
I refer you back to "take one copy, plagiarism"
"Take parts from thousands- not plagiarism"
There is clearly some fuzzy line where one becomes the other, but an AI likely takes less from each individual thing than a humans work by virtue of scale
"Take parts from thousands- not plagiarism"
There is clearly some fuzzy line where one becomes the other, but an AI likely takes less from each individual thing than a humans work by virtue of scale
It builds on the original in a different manner or for a different purpose?
Hell, collage counts for that and doesn't need permission (under us law at least)
i don't think plagiarism is the right word? It's not copying and presenting the original as your own?
Hell, collage counts for that and doesn't need permission (under us law at least)
i don't think plagiarism is the right word? It's not copying and presenting the original as your own?
October 26, 2025 at 12:11 PM
It builds on the original in a different manner or for a different purpose?
Hell, collage counts for that and doesn't need permission (under us law at least)
i don't think plagiarism is the right word? It's not copying and presenting the original as your own?
Hell, collage counts for that and doesn't need permission (under us law at least)
i don't think plagiarism is the right word? It's not copying and presenting the original as your own?
That doesn't fly, given it would say any influences you have from other media you've seen, is plagiarism?
Id would agree that the end product is the trained model, but that weakens the point, given it's an entirely different sort of thing, and would be more easily classed as a "transformative work"
Id would agree that the end product is the trained model, but that weakens the point, given it's an entirely different sort of thing, and would be more easily classed as a "transformative work"
October 26, 2025 at 11:54 AM
That doesn't fly, given it would say any influences you have from other media you've seen, is plagiarism?
Id would agree that the end product is the trained model, but that weakens the point, given it's an entirely different sort of thing, and would be more easily classed as a "transformative work"
Id would agree that the end product is the trained model, but that weakens the point, given it's an entirely different sort of thing, and would be more easily classed as a "transformative work"
Really hoping the AI bros don't start liking this and fucking over the algorithm or whatever
October 26, 2025 at 11:50 AM
Really hoping the AI bros don't start liking this and fucking over the algorithm or whatever
I think probably the point at which we regard "use"?
To me, (and some copyright law) it's end product.
You copy one thing, it's plagiarism.
You take thousands of influences, it's not.
That stands up in the case of human artists.
What makes an AIs output and process any different?
To me, (and some copyright law) it's end product.
You copy one thing, it's plagiarism.
You take thousands of influences, it's not.
That stands up in the case of human artists.
What makes an AIs output and process any different?
October 26, 2025 at 11:48 AM
I think probably the point at which we regard "use"?
To me, (and some copyright law) it's end product.
You copy one thing, it's plagiarism.
You take thousands of influences, it's not.
That stands up in the case of human artists.
What makes an AIs output and process any different?
To me, (and some copyright law) it's end product.
You copy one thing, it's plagiarism.
You take thousands of influences, it's not.
That stands up in the case of human artists.
What makes an AIs output and process any different?
Then why not prosecute anything done with a reference, if it takes more from the original work?
Again, iml it's scale and end product/goal that are the real issues, not the methods.
Again, iml it's scale and end product/goal that are the real issues, not the methods.
October 26, 2025 at 11:36 AM
Then why not prosecute anything done with a reference, if it takes more from the original work?
Again, iml it's scale and end product/goal that are the real issues, not the methods.
Again, iml it's scale and end product/goal that are the real issues, not the methods.
It contains patterns the way a AI model would see, similarity enough for a human to recognise.
Information science wise, that's information about the original.
Information science wise, that's information about the original.
October 26, 2025 at 11:24 AM
It contains patterns the way a AI model would see, similarity enough for a human to recognise.
Information science wise, that's information about the original.
Information science wise, that's information about the original.
As I said before, an llms matrices contain only a tiny bit of data from each individual thing used in training. Far less than would another piece created properly with almost any degree of reference?
I get the argument, but it doesn't quite work for me.
I get the argument, but it doesn't quite work for me.
October 26, 2025 at 11:18 AM
As I said before, an llms matrices contain only a tiny bit of data from each individual thing used in training. Far less than would another piece created properly with almost any degree of reference?
I get the argument, but it doesn't quite work for me.
I get the argument, but it doesn't quite work for me.
But RT games cloverpit streams are kinda good though
October 25, 2025 at 10:12 AM
But RT games cloverpit streams are kinda good though
Oh good lord the kitty
October 24, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Oh good lord the kitty
Piracy is also a kinda stupid concept and we all do it anyway :3c
Again, issue is end result, not method.
Again, issue is end result, not method.
October 23, 2025 at 6:42 AM
Piracy is also a kinda stupid concept and we all do it anyway :3c
Again, issue is end result, not method.
Again, issue is end result, not method.
Cheers :3
Didn't consider weight of water in the flow path in my head
Didn't consider weight of water in the flow path in my head
October 22, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Cheers :3
Didn't consider weight of water in the flow path in my head
Didn't consider weight of water in the flow path in my head
Objectively this makes sense, but I can't square the argument with "reference is fine", when another artist using a piece as reference contains more "information" about the piece than any AI matrix thingy does.
The core issue feels more to be the Intent to replace, not the yoinking for training use
The core issue feels more to be the Intent to replace, not the yoinking for training use
October 22, 2025 at 7:12 PM
Objectively this makes sense, but I can't square the argument with "reference is fine", when another artist using a piece as reference contains more "information" about the piece than any AI matrix thingy does.
The core issue feels more to be the Intent to replace, not the yoinking for training use
The core issue feels more to be the Intent to replace, not the yoinking for training use