Yi-Lun Jheng
banner
yilunjheng.bsky.social
Yi-Lun Jheng
@yilunjheng.bsky.social
32 followers 41 following 17 posts
On the job market ๐Ÿ” | Ph.D. in Educational & Communication Sciences from @UAntwerpen๐ŸŽ“ | Researching strategies to debunk misinformation, reading to learn, eye tracking & psychophysiological measures ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿง 
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
๐Ÿ™ ๐Œ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ง๐ค๐ฌ to @leencatrysse.bsky.social, @sandervdc.bsky.social, @kendeou.bsky.social,@kpoels.bsky.social, @davidgijbelsua.bsky.social !
Itโ€™s been ๐š ๐ฐ๐จ๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐ž๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐๐ก๐ƒ, ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐œ๐ก ๐š๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐ญ๐ž๐š๐ฆโค๏ธ
๐Ÿ“„ Read the full paper here: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
๐Ÿ” Know someone interested in the ๐ท๐‘ฆ๐‘›๐‘Ž๐‘š๐‘–๐‘๐ธ๐‘š๐‘œ instrument or keen on fighting misinformation? Please share this with them๐Ÿค—
#ScienceOfLearning #Misinformation #Emotion #EmotionsInLearning #Reading #OnlineMeasure #Education #Research
nature.com
๐Ÿ“Š Key findings:
โœ”๏ธ Refutation texts (any tone) improve knowledge revision across broader adult groups.
โœ”๏ธ Misinformation + correction sparks curiosity/confusion, reduces boredom.
โœ”๏ธ Experiencing negative emotions during key corrective sentences โ†’ less knowledge revision.
๐Ÿ†• Introducing ๐‘ซ๐’š๐’๐’‚๐’Ž๐’Š๐’„๐‘ฌ๐’Ž๐’: a novel computer-based tool that captures real-time emotions as readers engage with refutation texts๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ“š.
Readers pick an emoji per sentence ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ˜•, enabling granular, dynamic emotion trackingโ€”cost-effective & more accessible than physiological methods.
In this study, we examined the often-overlooked role of ๐ž๐ฉ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ฆ๐ข๐œ ๐ž๐ฆ๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ โ€”such as curiosity, confusion, and boredomโ€”in the process of ๐ค๐ง๐จ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ž๐๐ ๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง, building on the important work of Trevors & Kendeou (2020).
We took it a step furtherโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ“ขNew publication! Thrilled to share our work in ๐‘›๐‘๐‘— ๐‘ ๐‘๐‘–๐‘’๐‘›๐‘๐‘’ ๐‘œ๐‘“ ๐‘™๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘Ÿ๐‘›๐‘–๐‘›๐‘” by @springernature.com
๐Ÿง  How do ๐‘–๐‘› ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’ ๐‘š๐‘œ๐‘š๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ก emotions shape what you learn, especially when facing misinformation?
๐Ÿ’ก We introduce ๐‘ซ๐’š๐’๐’‚๐’Ž๐’Š๐’„๐‘ฌ๐’Ž๐’, a tool capturing real-time emotions during reading๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ”— www.nature.com/articles/s41...
๐Ÿ™ ๐Œ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ง๐ค๐ฌ to @leencatrysse.bsky.social, @sandervdc.bsky.social, @kendeou.bsky.social,
@kpoels.bsky.social, @davidgijbelsua.bsky.social!
Itโ€™s been ๐š ๐ฐ๐จ๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐ž๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐๐ก๐ƒ, ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐œ๐ก ๐š๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐ญ๐ž๐š๐ฆโค๏ธ
๐Ÿ“Š Key findings:
โœ”๏ธ Refutation texts (any tone) improve knowledge revision across broader adult groups.
โœ”๏ธ Misinformation + correction sparks curiosity/confusion, reduces boredom.
โœ”๏ธ Experiencing negative emotions during key corrective sentences โ†’ less knowledge revision.
๐Ÿ†• Introducing ๐‘ซ๐’š๐’๐’‚๐’Ž๐’Š๐’„๐‘ฌ๐’Ž๐’: a novel computer-based tool that captures real-time emotions as readers engage with refutation texts๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ“š.
Readers pick an emoji per sentence ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ˜•, enabling granular, dynamic emotion trackingโ€”cost-effective & more accessible than physiological methods.
In this study, we examined the often-overlooked role of ๐ž๐ฉ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ฆ๐ข๐œ ๐ž๐ฆ๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ โ€”such as curiosity, confusion, and boredomโ€”in the process of ๐ค๐ง๐จ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ž๐๐ ๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง, building on the important work of Trevors & Kendeou (2020).
We took it a step furtherโ€ฆ
Congrats! ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘
๐Ÿ™ŒHuge thanks to my supportive co-authors:
@sandervdc.bsky.social, Larissa De Brabandere, Kirsten Maertens & @kpoels.bsky.social!
๐Ÿค—Please share with anyone interested in #HealthComm, #Misinformation, #ScienceCommunication, or #VaccineResearch!
๐ŸŽฏ Takeaway: No one-size-fits-all strategy!
๐“๐š๐ข๐ฅ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐š๐ ๐ž๐ฌ to different audiences, and ๐›๐ž ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐  ๐ง๐ž๐ ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐ž๐ฆ๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ & their counter-persuasive impact
๐Ÿ’ก What we found:
โœ… ๐‚๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐ฆ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐š๐ ๐ž๐ฌ reduce misconceptions
๐Ÿšซ But ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐  ๐ง๐ž๐ ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐ž๐ฆ๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ lower effectiveness: For non-skeptics, narratives with harm trigger negativity;
For skeptics, narratives (with or without harm) reduce engagement
We focused on a key group: women pregnant or trying to conceiveโ€” common targets of vaccine misinformation on reproductive health๐Ÿคฐ
๐Ÿ”ŽWe tested: how ๐ง๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐ฏ๐ฌ. ๐ž๐ฑ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ corrections, with/without ๐ก๐š๐ซ๐ฆ-๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฆ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐š๐ ๐ž๐ฌ, shape outcomes
๐Ÿ“ขNew publication! Excited to share our research on ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐œ๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐ญ ๐ฏ๐š๐œ๐œ๐ข๐ง๐ž ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง ๐ฌ๐จ๐œ๐ข๐š๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ž๐๐ข๐š๐Ÿงฌ๐Ÿ“ฑ, published in ๐‘†๐‘๐‘–๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ก๐‘–๐‘“๐‘–๐‘ ๐‘…๐‘’๐‘๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘ก๐‘  @springernature.com
๐Ÿ”—
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
#DigitalMisinformation #HealthComm #Narrative #SocialMedia #SciComm #AcademicSky
Strategies to correct vaccine misinformation on social media for pregnant women and the impact of vaccine skepticism - Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports - Strategies to correct vaccine misinformation on social media for pregnant women and the impact of vaccine skepticism
www.nature.com